[ibg.git] / chapters / 13.rst

===========================
Captain Fate: the final cut
===========================

.. epigraph::

   | |CENTER| *Y was a youth, that did not love school;*
   | |CENTER| *Z was a zany, a poor harmless fool.*

.. only:: html

   .. image:: /images/picY.png
      :align: left

|Y|\ou'll probably be pleased to hear that Captain Fate has almost run his
allotted span.  There are some minor objects still to be defined -- the
toilet, our hero’s clothes, the all-important costume -- but first we need
to decorate the café a little more.

Additional catering garnish
===========================

We must not forget a couple of tiny details in the café room:

.. code-block:: inform

  Object   food "Benny's snacks" cafe
    with   name 'food' 'pastry' 'pastries' 'sandwich' 'sandwiches' 'snack'
           before [; "There is no time for FOOD right now."; ],
    has    scenery proper;

  Object   menu "menu" cafe
    with   name 'informative' 'menu' 'board' 'picture' 'writing',
           description
               "The menu board lists Benny's food and drinks, along with their
                prices. Too bad you've never learnt how to read, but luckily
                there is a picture of a big cup of coffee among the
                incomprehensible writing.",
           before [;
             Take:
               "The board is mounted on the wall behind Benny. Besides, it's
                useless WRITING.";
           ],
    has    scenery;

And a not-so-trivial object:

.. code-block:: inform

  Object  coffee "cup of coffee" benny
    with  name 'cup' 'of' 'coffee' 'steaming' 'cappuccino'
               'cappucino' 'capuccino' 'capucino',
          description [;
              if (self in benny)
                  "The picture on the menu board SURE looks good.";
              else
                  "It smells delicious.";
          ],
          before [;
            Take,Drink,Taste:
              if (self in benny) "You should ask Benny for one first.";
              else {
                  move self to benny;
                  print "You pick up the cup and swallow a mouthful. Benny's
                         WORLDWIDE REPUTATION is well deserved. Just as you
                         finish, Benny takes away the empty cup.";
                  if (benny.coffee_not_paid == true)
                      " ~That will be one quidbuck, sir.~";
                  else
                      "";
              }
            Buy:
              if (coin in player) <<Give coin benny>>;
              else                "You have no money.";
            Smell:
              "If your HYPERACTIVE pituitary glands are to be trusted,
               it's Colombian.";
          ];

There's nothing really new in this object (other than that the :prop:`name`
property caters for orthographically challenged players), but notice how we
don't ``remove`` it after the player drinks it.  In an apparently absurd
whim, the coffee returns to Benny magically (although this is not
information that the player needs to know).  Why?  After you remove an
object from the game, if the player attempts, say, to EXAMINE it, the
interpreter will impertinently state that "You can't see any such thing".
Moreover, if the player asks Benny for a second coffee, once the first one
has been removed, Benny will complain "I don’t think that’s on the menu,
sir" -- a blatant lie -- which was the default in Benny’s orders property.
Since the removed coffee object does not belong to Benny, it's not a noun
that the player can ASK Benny FOR.  By making it a child of the barman (who
has the :attr:`transparent` attribute set), the coffee is still an object
that players can refer to.  We ensure that they don't get more cups thanks
to Benny's ``coffee_asked_for`` property, which will remain :const:`true`
after the first time.

.. Generated by autoindex
.. index::
   pair: false; library constant

We also ensure that Benny doesn't ask for money from players who have
already paid, by first printing a "You pick up the cup..."  message and
then testing Benny's ``coffee_not_paid`` property.  If its value is
:const:`true`, we can finish the message with the "quidbuck"
print-and-return statement.  If its value is :const:`false`, the player has
previously paid, and so there's nothing else to say.  However, we still
need to terminate the incomplete message with a newline, and to return
:const:`true` from the property routine; we *could* have used the
statements ``{ print "^"; return true; }``, but an empty ``""`` statement
does the same thing more neatly.

Toilet or dressing room?
========================

Rather more of the latter, actually, since it's the only place away from
curious eyes where our hero will be able to metamorphose from weakling into
the bane of all evildoers.  And we *really* don't want to become, erm,
bogged down with details of the room's function or plumbing.

There's not a lot about the toilet room and its contents, though there will
be some tricky side effects:

.. code-block:: inform

  Room    toilet "Unisex toilet"
    with  description
              "A surprisingly CLEAN square room covered with glazed-ceramic
               tiles, featuring little more than a lavatory and a light switch.
               The only exit is south, through the door and into the cafe.",
          s_to toilet_door,
    has   ~light scored;

  Appliance lavatory "lavatory" toilet
    with name 'lavatory' 'wc' 'toilet' 'loo' 'bowl' 'can' 'john' 'bog',
         before [;
           Examine,Search,LookUnder:
             if (coin in self) {
                 move coin to parent(self);
                 "The latest user CIVILLY flushed it after use, but failed to
                  pick up the VALUABLE coin that fell from his pants.";
             }
           Receive:
             "While any other MORTALS might unwittingly throw just about
              ANYTHING into ", (the) self, ", you remember the WISE teachings
              of your mentor, Duke ELEGANT, about elderly plumbing and rising
              waters.";
         ];

  Object  coin "valuable coin" lavatory
    with  name 'valuable' 'coin' 'silver' 'quidbuck',
          description "It's a genuine SILVER QUIDBUCK.",
          before [;
            Drop:
              if (self notin player) return false;
              "Such a valuable coin? Har, har! This must be a demonstration of
               your ULTRA-FLIPPANT jesting!";
          ],
          after [;
            Take:
              "You crouch into the SLEEPING DRAGON position and deftly, with
               PARAMOUNT STEALTH, you pocket the lost coin.";
          ],
    has   scored;

We initially place the coin as a child of the lavatory (just so that we can
easily make the ``if (coin in self)`` one-time test).  Since the lavatory
does not have the :attr:`transparent` attribute set, the coin will be
invisible to players until they try to inspect the lavatory, an action that
will move the coin into the toilet room.  Once taken, the coin will remain
in the inventory until the player gives it to Benny, because we trap any
:act:`Drop` actions to help the player to Do the Right Thing.

The lavatory object includes a load of helpful synonyms in its name
property, including our favourite word ``'toilet'`` .  That won't be a
problem: the other objects here which may have TOILET in their names -- the
key and the door -- both use the ``pname`` property to turn their use of
``'toilet'`` into a lower-priority adjective.

.. Generated by autoindex
.. index::
   pair: scored; library attribute

See that here we have the only two :attr:`scored` attributes of the game.
The player will be awarded one point for entering the toilet room, and
another for finding and picking up the coin.

.. Generated by autoindex
.. index::
   pair: light; library attribute

You might have noticed that we are forcefully clearing the :attr:`light`
attribute, inherited from the ``Room`` class.  This will be a windowless
space and, to add a touch of realism, we'll make the room a dark one, which
will enable us to tell you about Inform's default behaviour when there's no
light to see by.  However, let's define first the light switch mentioned in
the room's description to aid players in their dressing duties.

.. code-block:: inform

  Appliance  light_switch "light switch" toilet
    with     name 'light' 'switch',
             description
                 "A notorious ACHIEVEMENT of technological SCIENCE, elegant yet
                  EASY to use.",
             before [;
               Push:
                 if (self has on) <<SwitchOff self>>;
                 else             <<SwitchOn  self>>;
             ],
             after [;
               SwitchOn:
                 give self light;
                 "You turn on the light in the toilet.";
               SwitchOff:
                 give self ~light;
                 "You turn off the light in the toilet.";
             ],
    has      switchable ~on;

Please notice the appearance of new attributes :attr:`switchable` and
:attr:`on`.  :attr:`switchable` enables the object to be turned on and off,
and is typical of lanterns, computers, television sets, radios, and so on.
The library automatically extends the description of these objects by
indicating if they are currently on or off:

.. code-block:: transcript

  > X LIGHT SWITCH
  A notorious ACHIEVEMENT of technological SCIENCE, elegant yet EASY to use.
  The light switch is currently switched on.

Two new actions are ready to use, :act:`SwitchOn` and :act:`SwitchOff`.
Left to themselves, they toggle the object's state between ON and OFF and
display a message like:

.. code-block:: transcript

  You switch the brass lantern on.

They also take care of checking if the player fumbled and tried to turn on
(or off) an object which was already on (or off).  How does the library
know the state of the object?  This is thanks to the :attr:`on` attribute,
which is set or cleared automatically as needed.  You can, of course, set
or clear it manually like any other attribute, with the ``give`` statement:

.. code-block:: inform

  give self on;

  give self ~on;

and check if a :attr:`switchable` object is on or off with the test:

.. code-block:: inform

  if (light_switch has on) ...

  if (light_switch hasnt on) ...

A :attr:`switchable` object is OFF by default.  However, you’ll notice that
the has line of the object definition includes ``~on`` :

.. code-block:: inform

  has    switchable ~on;

Surely that’s saying "not-on"?  Surely that's what would have happened
anyway if the line hadn't mentioned the attribute at all?

.. code-block:: inform

  has    switchable;

Absolutely true.  Adding that ``~on`` attribute has no effect whatsoever on
the game -- but nevertheless it's a good idea.  It's an aide-mémoire, a way
of reminding ourselves that we start with the attribute clear, and that at
some point we'll be setting it for some purpose.  Trust us: it's worthwhile
taking tiny opportunities like this to help yourself.

.. Generated by autoindex
.. index::
   pair: after; library property

Let’s see how our light switch works.  We trap the :act:`SwitchOn` and
:act:`SwitchOff` actions in the :prop:`after` property (when the switching
has successfully taken place) and use them to give :attr:`light` to the
light switch.

Uh, wait.  To the light switch?  Why not to the toilet room?  Well, there's
a reason and we'll see it in a minute.  For now, just remember that, in
order for players to see their surroundings, you need only one object in a
room with the :attr:`light` attribute set.  It doesn't have to be the room
itself (though this is usually convenient).

After setting the :attr:`light` attribute, we display a customised message,
to avoid the default:

.. code-block:: transcript

  You switch the light switch on.

which, given the name of the object, doesn't read very elegantly.  We
foresee that players might try to PUSH SWITCH, so we trap this attempt in a
:prop:`before` property and redirect it to :act:`SwitchOn` and
:act:`SwitchOff` actions, checking first which one is needed by testing the
:attr:`on` attribute.  Finally, we have made the switch a member of the
class ``Appliance``, so that the player doesn't walk away with it.

.. note::

  Remember what we said about class inheritance?  No matter what you define
  in the class, the object’s definition has priority.  The class
  ``Appliance`` defines a response for the :act:`Push` action, but we
  override it here with a new behaviour.

And there was light
===================

So the player walks into the toilet and

.. code-block:: transcript

  Darkness
  It is pitch dark, and you can't see a thing.

Oops!  No toilet description, no mention of the light switch, nothing.  It
is reasonable to think that if we have opened the toilet door to access the
toilet, some light coming from the café room will illuminate our
surroundings -- at least until the player decides to close the door.  So
perhaps it would be a good idea to append a little code to the door object
to account for this.  A couple of lines in the after property will suffice:

.. code-block:: inform

  after [ ks;
    Unlock:
      if (self has locked) return false;
      print "You unlock ", (the) self, " and open it.^";
      ks = keep_silent; keep_silent = true;
      <Open self>; keep_silent = ks;
      return true;
    Open:
      give toilet light;
    Close:
      give toilet ~light;

  ],

And this is the reason why the light switch didn't set the :attr:`light`
attribute of the toilet room, but did it to itself.  We avoid running into
trouble if we let the open/closed states of the door control the light of
the room object, and the on/off states of the switch control the light of
the switch.  So it is one shiny light switch.  Fortunately, players are
never aware of this glowing artefact.

.. note::

  Now, could they?  Well, if players could TAKE the light switch (which we
  have forbidden) and then did INVENTORY, the trick would be given away,
  because all objects with the :attr:`light` attribute set are listed as
  ``(providing light)`` .

So the player walks into the toilet and

.. code-block:: transcript

  Unisex toilet
  A surprisingly CLEAN square room covered with glazed-ceramic tiles, featuring
  little more than a lavatory and a light switch. The only exit is south, through
  the door and into the cafe.

  [Your score has just gone up by one point.]

Better.  Now, suppose the player closes the door.

.. code-block:: transcript

  >CLOSE DOOR
  You close the door to the cafe.

  It is now pitch dark in here!

The player might try then to LOOK:

Well, no problem.  We have mentioned that there is a light switch.  Surely 
the player will now try to:

.. code-block:: transcript

  >TURN ON LIGHT SWITCH
  You can't see any such thing.

Oops!  Things are getting nasty here in the dark.  It's probably time to
leave this place and try another approach:

.. code-block:: transcript

  >OPEN DOOR
  You can't see any such thing.

And this illustrates one of the terrible things about darkness in a game.
You can't see anything; you can do very little indeed.  All objects except
those in your inventory are out of scope, unreachable, as if non-existent.
Worse, if you DROP one of the objects you are carrying, it will be
swallowed by the dark, never to be found until there is light to see by.

The player, who is doubtless immersed in the fantasy of the game, will now
be a little annoyed.  "I am in a small bathroom and I can't even reach the
door I have just closed?"  The player's right, of course [#dark]_.
Darkened rooms are one cliché of traditional games.  Usually you move in
one direction while looking for treasure in some underground cave, and
suddenly arrive at a pitch black place.  It's good behaviour of the game to
disallow exploration of unknown dark territory, and it's a convention to
bar passage to players until they return with a light source.  However, if
the scenario of the game features, say, the player character's home, a
little apartment with two rooms, and there’s no light in the kitchen, we
could expect the owner of the house to know how to move around a little,
perhaps groping for the light switch or even going to the refrigerator in
the dark.

We are in a similar situation.  The inner logic of the game demands that
blind players should be able to open the door and probably operate the
light switch they've just encountered.  We have been telling you that an
object is in scope when it’s in the same room as the player.  Darkness
changes that rule.  All objects not directly carried by the player become
out of scope.

One of the advantages of an advanced design system like Inform is the
flexibility to change all default behaviours to suit your particular needs.
Scope problems are no different.  There is a set of routines and functions
to tamper with what's in scope when.  We'll see just a tiny example to fix
our particular problem.  In the section "``Entry point routines``" of our
game -- after the ``Initialise`` routine, for instance -- include the
following lines:

.. code-block:: inform

  [ InScope person;
      if (person == player && location == thedark && real_location == toilet) {
          PlaceInScope(light_switch);
          PlaceInScope(toilet_door);
      }
      return false;
  ];

:samp:`InScope({actor_obj_id})` is an entry point routine that can tamper
with the scope rules for the given :samp:`{actor_obj_id}` (either the
player character or a NPC).  We define it with one variable (which we name
as we please; it's also a good idea to name variables in an intuitive way
to remind us of what they represent), ``person`` , and then we make a
complex test to see if the player is actually in the toilet and in the
dark.

.. Generated by autoindex
.. index::
   pair: location; library variable
   pair: real_location; library variable

We have told you that the library variable :var:`location` holds the
current room that the player is in.  However, when there is no light, the
variable location gets assigned to the value of the special library object
thedark .  It doesn't matter if we have ten dark rooms in our game;
location will be equal to thedark in all of them.  There is yet another
variable, called :var:`real_location`, which holds the room the player is
in *even when there is no light to see by*.

So the test:

.. code-block:: inform

  if (person == player && location == thedark && real_location == toilet) ...

is stating: if the specified actor is the :var:`player` character *and* he
finds himself in the dark *and* he actually happens to be in the toilet...

.. Generated by autoindex
.. index::
   pair: true; library constant

Then we make a call to one of the library routines,
:samp:`PlaceInScope({obj_id})`, which has a very descriptive name: it
places in scope the given object.  In our case, we want both the door and
the light switch to be within reach of the player, hence both additional
lines.  Finally, we must ``return false``, because we want the normal scope
rules for the defined actor -- the player -- to apply to the rest of the
objects of the game (if we returned :const:`true`, players would find that
they are able to interact with very little indeed).  Now we get a
friendlier and more logical response:

.. code-block:: transcript

  Darkness
  It is pitch dark, and you can't see a thing.

  >TURN ON SWITCH
  You turn on the light in the toilet.

  Unisex toilet
  A surprisingly CLEAN square room covered with glazed-ceramic tiles, featuring
  little more than a lavatory and a light switch. The only exit is south, through
  the door and into the cafe.

And the same would happen with the door.  Notice how the room description
gets displayed after we pass from dark to light; this is the normal library
behaviour.

There is still one final problem which, admittedly, might originate from an
improbable course of action; however, it could be a nuisance.  Suppose that
the player enters the toilet, locks the door -- which is possible in the
dark now that the door is in scope -- and then drops the key.  There's no
way to exit the toilet -- because the door is locked and the key has
disappeared, engulfed by the darkness -- unless the player thinks to turn
on the light switch, thereby placing the key in scope once more.

Why don't we add a :samp:`PlaceInScope({toilet_key})` to the above routine?
Well, for starters, the key can be moved around (as opposed to the door or
the light switch, which are fixed items in the toilet room).  Suppose the
player opens the door of the toilet, but drops the key in the café, then
enters the toilet and closes the door.  The condition is met and the key is
placed in scope, when it's in another room.  Second, this is a simple game
with just a few objects, so you can define a rule for each of them; but in
any large game, you might like to be able to refer to objects in bunches,
and make general rules that apply to all (or some) of them.

.. Generated by autoindex
.. index::
   pair: moved; library attribute
   pair: scenery; library attribute
   pair: static; library attribute

We need to add code to the ``InScope`` routine, telling the game to place
in scope all objects that we drop in the dark, so that we might recover
them (maybe going on all fours and groping a little, but it’s a possible
action).  We don’t want the player to have other objects in scope (like the
coin, for instance), so it might be good to have a way of testing if the
objects have been touched and carried by the player.  The attribute
:attr:`moved` is perfect for this.  The library sets it for every object
that the player has picked up at one time in the game; :attr:`scenery` and
:attr:`static` objects, and those we have not yet seen don't have
:attr:`moved`.  Here is the reworked ``InScope`` routine.  There are a
couple of new concepts to look at:

.. code-block:: inform

  [ InScope person item;
      if (person == player && location == thedark && real_location == toilet) {
          PlaceInScope(light_switch);
          PlaceInScope(toilet_door);
      }
      if (person == player && location == thedark)
          objectloop (item in parent(player))
              if (item has moved) PlaceInScope(item);
      return false;
  ];

We have added one more local variable to the routine, ``item`` -- again,
this is a variable we have created and named on our own; it is not part of
the library.  We make now a new test: if the actor is the player and the
location is any dark room, then perform a certain action.  We don't need to
specify the toilet, because we want this rule to apply to all dark rooms
(well, the only dark room in the game *is* the toilet, but we are trying to
provide a general rule).

   :samp:`objectloop (variable) {statement};`

is a loop statement, one of the four defined in Inform.  A loop statement
is a construct that allows you to run several times through a statement (or
a statement block).  ``objectloop`` performs the :samp:`{statement}` once
for every object defined in the (:samp:`{variable}`) .  If we were to code:

   :samp:`objectloop (item) {statement};`

then the :samp:`{statement}` would be executed once for each object in the
game.  However, we want to perform the statement only for those objects
whose parent object is the same as the player's parent object: that is, for
objects in the same room as the player, so we instead code:

   :samp:`objectloop (item in parent(player)) {statement};`

What is the actual :samp:`{statement}` that we'll repeatedly execute?

.. code-block:: inform

  if (item has moved)
      PlaceInScope(item);

The test: ``if (item has moved)`` ensures that ``PlaceInScope(item)`` deals
only with objects with the :attr:`moved` attribute set.  So: if the player
is in the dark, let’s go through the objects which are in the same room,
one at a time.  For each of them, check if it's an item that the player has
at some time carried, in which case, place it in scope.  All dropped
objects within the room were carried at one time, so we let players
recollect them even if they can’t see them.

As you see, darkness has its delicate side.  If you plan to have dark rooms
galore in your games, bear in mind that you are in for some elaborate code
(unless you let the library carry on with default rules, in which case
there won't be much for your players to do).

Amazing techicolour dreamcoats
==============================

This leaves us the clothing items themselves, which will require a few
tailored actions.  Let's see first the ordinary garments of John Covarth:

.. code-block:: inform

  Object  clothes "your clothes"
    with  name 'ordinary' 'street' 'clothes' 'clothing',
          description
              "Perfectly ORDINARY-LOOKING street clothes for a NOBODY like
               John Covarth.",
          before [;
            Wear:
              if (self has worn)
                  "You are already dressed as John Covarth.";
              else
                  "The town NEEDS the power of Captain FATE, not the anonymity
                   of John Covarth.";
            Change,Disrobe:
              if (self hasnt worn)
                 "Your KEEN eye detects that you're no longer wearing them.";
              switch (location) {
                street:
                  if (player in booth)
                      "Lacking Superman's super-speed, you realise that it
                       would be awkward to change in plain view of the passing
                       pedestrians.";          
                  else
                      "In the middle of the street? That would be a PUBLIC
                       SCANDAL, to say nothing of revealing your secret
                       identity.";
                cafe:
                      "Benny allows no monkey business in his establishment.";
                toilet:
                  if (toilet_door has open)
                      "The door to the bar stands OPEN at tens of curious eyes.
                       You'd be forced to arrest yourself for LEWD conduct.";
                  print "You quickly remove your street clothes and bundle them
                         up together into an INFRA MINUSCULE pack ready for easy
                         transportation. ";
                  if (toilet_door has locked) {
                      give clothes ~worn; give costume worn;
                      "Then you unfold your INVULNERABLE-COTTON costume and
                       turn into Captain FATE, defender of free will, adversary
                       of tyranny!";
                  }
                  else {
                      deadflag = 3;
                      "Just as you are slipping into Captain FATE's costume,
                       the door opens and a young woman enters. She looks at
                       you and starts screaming, ~RAPIST! NAKED RAPIST IN THE
                       TOILET!!!~^^
                       Everybody in the cafe quickly comes to the rescue, only
                       to find you ridiculously jumping on one leg while trying
                       to get dressed. Their laughter brings a QUICK END to
                       your crime-fighting career!";
                  }
                thedark:
                  "Last time you changed in the dark, you wore the suit inside
                   out!";
                default:                  ! this _should_ never happen...
                  "There must be better places to change your clothes!";
              }
          ],
    clothing proper pluralname;

See how the object deals only with :act:`Wear`, :act:`Disrobe` and
:act:`Change`.  :act:`Wear` and :act:`Disrobe` are standard library actions
already defined in Inform, but we'll have to make a new verb to allow for
CHANGE CLOTHES.  In this game, :act:`Disrobe` and :act:`Change` are
considered synonymous for all purposes; we'll deal with them first.

.. Generated by autoindex
.. index::
   pair: location; library variable
   pair: worn; library attribute

The goal of the game is for players to change their clothes, so we might
expect them to try this almost anywhere; but first of all we have to check
that the ``clothes`` object is actually being worn.  If not, we display a
message reminding the player that this action has become irrelevant.  What
we do with the ``switch`` statement is to offer a variety of responses
according to the :var:`location` variable.  The street (in or out of the
booth) and the café all display refusals of some kind, until the player
character manages to enter the toilet, where we additionally require that
he locks the door before taking off his clothes.  If the door is closed but
not locked, he is interrupted in his naked state by a nervous woman who
starts shouting, and the game is lost (this is not as unfair as it seems,
because the player may always revert to the previous state with UNDO).  If
the door is locked, he succeeds in his transformation (we take away the
:attr:`worn` attribute from the ``clothes`` and give it to the ``costume``
instead).  We add a special refusal to change in the dark, forcing players
to turn on the light and then, we hope, to find the coin.  And finally we
code a ``default`` entry; you'll remember that, in a ``switch`` statement,
this is supposed to cater for any value not explicitly listed for the
expression under control -- in this case, for the variable :var:`location`.
Since we have already gone through all the possible locations of the game,
this entry appears only as a defensive measure, just in case something
unexpected happens (for instance, we might extend the game with another
room and forget about this ``switch`` statement).  In normal and controlled
conditions, it should never be reached, but it doesn't hurt one bit to have
it there.

The :act:`Wear` action just checks if these clothes are already being worn,
to offer two different rejection responses: the goal of the game is to
change into the hero's suit, after which we'll prevent a change back into
ordinary clothes.  So now we are dealing with a Captain Fate in full
costume:

.. code-block:: inform

  Object   costume "your costume"
    with   name 'captain' 'captain^s' 'fate' 'fate^s' 'costume' 'suit',
           description
               "STATE OF THE ART manufacture, from chemically reinforced 100%
                COTTON-lastic(tm).",
           before [;
             Wear:
               if (self has worn)
                   "You are already dressed as Captain FATE.";
               else
                   "First you'd have to take off your commonplace unassuming
                    John Covarth INCOGNITO street clothes.";
             Change,Disrobe:
               if (self has worn)
                   "You need to wear your costume to FIGHT crime!";
               else
                   "But you're not yet wearing it!";
             Drop:
               "Your UNIQUE Captain FATE multi-coloured costume? The most
                coveted clothing ITEM in the whole city? Certainly NOT!";
           ],
    has    clothing proper;

Note that we intercept the action WEAR COSTUME and hint that players should
try TAKE OFF CLOTHES instead.  We don't let them take off the costume once
it’s being worn, and we certainly don't let them misplace it anywhere, by
refusing to accept a :act:`Drop` action.

It's a wrap
===========

Nearly there; just a few minor odds and ends to round things off.

.. rubric:: Initialise routine

All the objects of our game are defined.  Now we must add a couple of lines
to the ``Initialise`` routine to make sure that the player does not start
the game naked:

.. code-block:: inform

  [ Initialise;
      #Ifdef DEBUG; pname_verify(); #Endif;       ! suggested by pname.h
      location = street;
      move costume to player;
      move clothes to play; give clothes worn;
      lookmode = 2;
      "^^Impersonating mild mannered John Covarth, assistant help boy at an
       insignificant drugstore, you suddenly STOP when your acute hearing
       deciphers a stray radio call from the POLICE. There's some MADMAN
       attacking the population in Granary Park! You must change into your
       Captain FATE costume fast...!^^";
  ];

Remember that we included a disambiguation package, ``pname.h``?  There
were some additional comments in the accompanying text file that should be
taken in consideration:

  pname.h provides a pname_verify routine.  When DEBUG is defined, you may
  call pname_verify() in your Initialise() routine to verify the pname
  properties in your objects.

The designer of the package has made a debugging tool (a routine) to check
for errors when using his library, and he tells us how to use it.  So we
include the suggested lines into our ``Initialise`` routine:

.. code-block:: inform

  #Ifdef DEBUG; pname_verify(); #Endif;

As the text explains, what this does is: first check whether the game is
being compiled in Debug mode; if this is the case, run the ``pname_verify``
routine, so that it tests all ``pname`` properties to see if they are
written correctly.

.. rubric:: Demise of our hero

We have made three possible endings:

#. The player attempts to change in the toilet with an unlocked door.

#. The player tries to attack Benny while wearing the costume.

#. The player manages to exit the café dressed as Captain Fate.

(1) and (2) lose the game, (3) wins it.  The library defaults for these two
states display, respectively,

.. code-block:: transcript

  *** You have died ***

  *** You have won ***

These states correspond to the values of the :var:`deadflag` variable: 1
for losing, 2 for winning.  However, we have made up different messages,
because our hero does not really die -- ours suffers a FATE worse than
death -- and because we want to give him a more descriptive winning line.
Therefore, we must define a ``DeathMessage`` routine as we did in "William
Tell", to write our customised messages and assign them to :var:`deadflag`
values greater than 2.

.. code-block:: inform

  [ DeathMessage;
      if (deadflag == 3) print "Your secret identity has been revealed";
      if (deadflag == 4) print "You have been SHAMEFULLY defeated";
      if (deadflag == 5) print "You fly away to SAVE the DAY";
  ];

.. rubric:: Grammar

Finally, we need to extend the existing grammar, to allow for a couple of
things.  We have already seen that we need a verb CHANGE.  We'll make it
really simple:

.. code-block:: inform

  [ ChangeSub;
      if (noun has pluralname) print "They're";
      else                     print "That's";
      " not something you must change to save the day.";
  ];

  Verb 'change' 'exchange' 'swap' 'swop'
      * noun                     -> Change;

Just notice how the verb handler checks whether the noun given is plural or
singular, to display a suitable pronoun.

A further detail: when players are in the café, they might ask Benny for
the coffee (as we intend and heavily hint), for a sandwich or a pastry
(both mentioned in the café description), for food or a snack (mentioned
here and there, and we have provided for those); but what if they try a
meat pie?  Or scrambled eggs?  There’s just so much decoration one can
reasonably insert in a game, and loading the dictionary with Benny’s full
menu would be overdoing it a bit.

.. Generated by autoindex
.. index::
   pair: Give; library action

One might reasonably imagine that the ``default`` line at the end of the
:act:`Give` action in the orders property handles every input not already
specified:

.. code-block:: inform

  orders [;
    Give:
      switch (noun) {
        toilet_key:  ! code for the key...
        coffee:      ! code for the coffee...
        food:        ! code for the food...
        menu:        ! code for the menu...
        default:
          "~I don't think that's on the menu, sir.~";
      }
  ],

Not so.  The library grammar that deals with ASK BENNY FOR... is this
(specifically, the last line):

.. code-block:: inform

  Verb 'ask'
      * creature 'about' topic    -> Ask
      * creature 'for' noun       -> AskFor

You'll see the :var:`noun` token, which means that whatever the player asks
him for must be a real game object, visible at that moment.  Assuming that
the player mentions such an object, the interpreter finds it in the
dictionary and places its internal ID in the :var:`noun` variable, where
our ``switch`` statement can handle it.  So, ASK BENNY FOR KEY assigns the
``toilet_key`` object to the noun variable, and Benny responds.  ASK BENNY
FOR CUSTOMERS also works; the ``default`` case picks that one up.  But, ASK
BENNY FOR SPAGHETTI BOLOGNESE won't work: we have no object for Spaghetti
Bolognese (or any other delicacy from Benny's kitchen) -- the words
``'spaghetti'`` and ``'bolognese'`` simply aren't in the dictionary.  This
is perhaps not a major deficiency in our game, but it takes very little to
allow Benny to use his default line for *any* undefined input from the
player.  We need to extend the existing ASK grammar:

.. code-block:: inform

  Extend 'ask'
      * creature 'for' topic    -> AskFor;

This line will be added to the end of the existing grammar for Ask, so it
doesn’t override the conventional noun-matching line.  ``topic`` is a token
that roughly means "any input at all"; the value of noun isn't important,
because it'll be handled by the default case.  Now players may ask Benny
for a tuna sandwich or a good time; they'll get: "I don’t think that’s on
the menu, sir", which makes Benny a barman with attitude.

And that's it; on the slightly surreal note of ASK BENNY FOR A GOOD TIME
we've taken "Captain Fate" as far as we intend to.  The guide is nearly
done.  All that's left is to recap some of the more important issues, talk
a little more about compilation and debugging, and send you off into the
big wide world of IF authorship.

.. rubric:: Footnotes

.. [#dark]
   We're alluding here to the Classical concept of mimesis.  In an
   oft-quoted essay from 1996, Roger Giner-Sorolla wrote: "I see successful
   fiction as an imitation or 'mimesis' of reality, be it this world's or
   an alternate world's.  Well-written fiction leads the reader to
   temporarily enter and believe in the reality of that world.  A crime
   against mimesis is any aspect of an IF game that breaks the coherence of
   its fictional world as a representation of reality."