Improve test coverage.

[open-adventure.git] / notes.adoc

diff --git a/notes.adoc b/notes.adoc
index 4a166bd9eb6f8230427a8936c6807fee90c7f07f..475ca94fa7aea635737685bbb3137f4349f203b7 100644 (file)
--- a/notes.adoc
+++ b/notes.adoc
@@ -79,8 +79,10 @@ ugly and quite unreadable.
 
 Jason Ninneman and I have moved it to what is almost, but not quite,
 idiomatic modern C.  We refactored the right way, checking correctness
 
 Jason Ninneman and I have moved it to what is almost, but not quite,
 idiomatic modern C.  We refactored the right way, checking correctness

-against a comprehensive test suite that we built first and verified with
-coverage tools. This is what you are running when you do "make check".
+against a comprehensive test suite that we built first and verified
+with coverage tools (we have 88% coverage, with the remaining 12%
+confined to exception cases that are difficult to reach). This is
+what you are running when you do "make check".

 
 This move entailed some structural changes.  The most important was
 the refactoring of over 350 gotos into if/loop/break structures.  We
 
 This move entailed some structural changes.  The most important was
 the refactoring of over 350 gotos into if/loop/break structures.  We


@@ -109,7 +111,6 @@ ways:
   We don't need whatever minor performance gains this might collect,
   and the choice to refrain will make forward translation into future
   languages easier.
   We don't need whatever minor performance gains this might collect,
   and the choice to refrain will make forward translation into future
   languages easier.

-

 * There are a few gotos left that resist restructuring; all of these
   are in the principal command interpreter function implementing its
   state machine.
 * There are a few gotos left that resist restructuring; all of these
   are in the principal command interpreter function implementing its
   state machine.