+#+BEGIN_SRC scheme
+ (define-method (handle-line (irc-bot <my-irc-bot>) speaker channel
+ line emote?)
+ ;; [... snip ...]
+ (define (respond respond-line)
+ (<- irc-bot (actor-id irc-bot) 'send-line
+ (if (looks-like-me? channel)
+ speaker ; PM session
+ channel) ; normal IRC channel
+ respond-line))
+ ;; [... snip ...]
+ )
+#+END_SRC
+
+Re-evaluate and test.
+
+#+BEGIN_SRC text
+IRC> /query examplebot
+<foo-user> examplebot: hi!
+<examplebot> Oh hi foo-user!
+#+END_SRC
+
+Horray!
+
+** Writing our own actors and sending messages between them
+
+Let's write the most basic, boring actor possible.
+How about an actor that start sleeping, and keeps sleeping?
+
+#+BEGIN_SRC scheme
+ (use-modules (oop goops)
+ (8sync))
+
+ (define-class <sleeper> (<actor>)
+ (actions #:allocation #:each-subclass
+ #:init-value (build-actions
+ (loop sleeper-loop))))
+
+ (define (sleeper-loop actor message)
+ (while (actor-am-i-alive? actor)
+ (display "Zzzzzzzz....\n")
+ ;; Sleep for one second
+ (8sleep 1)))
+
+ (let* ((hive (make-hive))
+ (sleeper (hive-create-actor hive <sleeper>)))
+ (run-hive hive (list (bootstrap-message hive sleeper 'loop))))
+#+END_SRC
+
+We see some particular things in this example.
+One thing is that our <sleeper> actor has an actions slot.
+This is used to look up what the "action handler" for a message is.
+We have to set the #:allocation to either #:each-subclass or #:class.
+(#:class should be fine, except there is [[https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25211][a bug in Guile]] which keeps
+us from using it for now.)
+
+In our sleeper-loop we also see a call to "8sleep".
+"8sleep" is like Guile's "sleep" method, except it is non-blocking
+and will always yield to the scheduler.
+
+Our while loop also checks "actor-am-i-alive?" to see whether or not
+it is still registered.
+In general, if you keep a loop in your actor that regularly yields
+to the scheduler, you should check this.
+(An alternate way to handle it would be to not use a while loop at all
+but simply send a message to ourselves with "<-" to call the
+sleeper-loop handler again.
+If the actor was dead, the message simply would not be delivered and
+thus the loop would stop.)
+
+This actor is pretty lazy though.
+Time to get back to work!
+
+#+BEGIN_SRC scheme
+ (use-modules (8sync)
+ (oop goops))
+
+ (define-class <manager> (<actor>)
+ (direct-report #:init-keyword #:direct-report
+ #:getter manager-direct-report)
+ (actions #:allocation #:each-subclass
+ #:init-value (build-actions
+ (assign-task manager-assign-task))))
+
+ (define (manager-assign-task manager message difficulty)
+ "Delegate a task to our direct report"
+ (display "manager> Work on this task for me!\n")
+ (<- manager (manager-direct-report manager)
+ 'work-on-this difficulty))
+#+END_SRC
+
+Here we're constructing a very simple manager actor.
+This manager keeps track of a direct report and tells them to start
+working on a task... simple delegation.
+Nothing here is really new, but note that our friend "<-" (which means
+"send message") is back.
+There's one difference this time... the first time we saw "<-" was in
+the handle-line procedure of the irc-bot, and in that case we explicitly
+pulled the actor-id after the actor we were sending the message to
+(ourselves), which we aren't doing here.
+But that was an unusual case, because the actor was ourself.
+In this case, and in general, actors don't have direct references to
+other actors; instead, all they have is access to identifiers which
+reference other actors.
+
+#+BEGIN_SRC scheme
+ (define-class <worker> (<actor>)
+ (task-left #:init-keyword #:task-left
+ #:accessor worker-task-left)
+ (actions #:allocation #:each-subclass
+ #:init-value (build-actions
+ (work-on-this worker-work-on-this))))
+
+ (define (worker-work-on-this worker message difficulty)
+ ""
+ (set! (worker-task-left worker) difficulty)
+ (display "worker> Whatever you say, boss!\n")
+ (while (and (actor-am-i-alive? worker)
+ (> (worker-task-left worker) 0))
+ (display "worker> *huff puff*\n")
+ (set! (worker-task-left worker)
+ (- (worker-task-left worker) 1))
+ (8sync (/ 1 3)))
+ (display "worker> Looks like I'm done! Can I go home yet?\n"))
+#+END_SRC
+
+The worker also contains familiar code, but we now see that we can
+call 8sync with non-integer real numbers.
+
+Looks like there's nothing left to do but run it:
+
+#+BEGIN_SRC scheme
+ (let* ((hive (make-hive))
+ (worker (hive-create-actor hive <worker>))
+ (manager (hive-create-actor hive <manager>
+ #:direct-report worker)))
+ (run-hive hive (list (bootstrap-message hive manager 'assign-task 5))))
+#+END_SRC
+
+#+BEGIN_SRC text
+manager> Work on this task for me!
+worker> Whatever you say, boss!
+worker> *huff puff*
+worker> *huff puff*
+worker> *huff puff*
+worker> *huff puff*
+worker> *huff puff*
+worker> Looks like I'm done! Can I go home yet?
+#+END_SRC
+
+"<-" pays no attention to what happens with the messages it has sent
+off.
+This is useful in many cases... we can blast off many messages and
+continue along without holding anything back.
+
+But sometimes we want to make sure that something completes before
+we do something else, or we want to send a message and get some sort
+of information back.
+Luckily 8sync comes with an answer to that with "<-wait", which will
+suspend the caller until the callee gives some sort of response, but
+which does not block the rest of the program from running.
+Let's try applying that to our own code by turning our manager
+into a micromanager.
+
+#+END_SRC
+#+BEGIN_SRC scheme
+ ;;; Update this method
+ (define (manager-assign-task manager message difficulty)
+ "Delegate a task to our direct report"
+ (display "manager> Work on this task for me!\n")
+ (<- manager (manager-direct-report manager)
+ 'work-on-this difficulty)
+
+ ;; call the micromanagement loop
+ (manager-micromanage-loop manager))
+
+ ;;; And add the following
+ ;;; (... Note: do not model actual employee management off this)
+ (define (manager-micromanage-loop manager)
+ "Pester direct report until they're done with their task."
+ (display "manager> Are you done yet???\n")
+ (let ((still-working
+ (msg-val (<-wait manager (manager-direct-report manager)
+ 'done-yet?))))
+ (if still-working
+ (begin (display "manager> Harumph!\n")
+ (8sleep 1)
+ (when (actor-am-i-alive? manager)
+ (manager-micromanage-loop manager)))
+ (begin (display "manager> Oh! I guess you can go home then.\n")
+ (<- manager (manager-direct-report manager) 'go-home)))))
+#+END_SRC
+
+We've appended a micromanagement loop here... but what's going on?
+"<-wait", as it sounds, waits for a reply, and returns a reply
+message.
+In this case there's a value in the body of the message we want,
+so we pull it out with msg-val.
+(It's possible for a remote actor to return multiple values, in which
+case we'd want to use msg-receive, but that's a bit more complicated.)
+
+Of course, we need to update our worker accordingly as well.
+
+#+BEGIN_SRC scheme
+ ;;; Update the worker to add the following new actions:
+ (define-class <worker> (<actor>)
+ (task-left #:init-keyword #:task-left
+ #:accessor worker-task-left)
+ (actions #:allocation #:each-subclass
+ #:init-value (build-actions
+ (work-on-this worker-work-on-this)
+ ;; Add these:
+ (done-yet? worker-done-yet?)
+ (go-home worker-go-home))))
+
+ ;;; New procedures:
+ (define (worker-done-yet? worker message)
+ "Reply with whether or not we're done yet."
+ (<-reply worker message
+ (= (worker-task-left worker) 0)))
+
+ (define (worker-go-home worker message)
+ "It's off of work for us!"
+ (display "worker> Whew! Free at last.")
+ (self-destruct worker))
+#+END_SRC
projects / 8sync.git / blobdiff