Fix unnecessary conditional check.

[8sync.git] / 8sync / actors.scm

diff --git a/8sync/actors.scm b/8sync/actors.scm
index fc8afcad3a6200550ae90396aff05881cd6fff5f..8abe41a1133b20c65dcaf8a3ff3ca1c5f40a8c3e 100644 (file)
--- a/8sync/actors.scm
+++ b/8sync/actors.scm
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@
 ;; This is the internal, generalized message sending method.
 ;; Users shouldn't use it!  Use the <-foo forms instead.
 
-(define-inlinable (%<- wants-reply from-actor to action args message-id in-reply-to)
+(define (%<- wants-reply from-actor to action args message-id in-reply-to)
   ;; Okay, we need to deal with message ids.
   ;; Could we get rid of them? :\
   ;; It seems if we can use eq? and have messages be immutable then
@@ -180,7 +180,13 @@
      'TODO)
     ;; A message sent to nobody goes nowhere.
     ;; TODO: Should we display a warning here, probably?
-    (#f #f)))
+    (#f #f)
+    ;; We shouldn't technically be passing in actors but rather their
+    ;; addresses, but often actors want to message themselves and
+    ;; this makes that slightly easier.
+    ((? (lambda (x) (is-a? x <actor>)) actor)
+     (%<- wants-reply from-actor (actor-id actor) action
+          args message-id in-reply-to))))
 
 (define (<- to action . args)
   (define from-actor (*current-actor*))
@@ -366,10 +372,9 @@ and handling them."
           (lambda vals
             ;; Return reply if necessary
             (when (message-wants-reply message)
-              (when (message-wants-reply message)
-                (%<- #f actor (message-from message) '*reply*
-                     vals ((actor-msg-id-generator actor))
-                     (message-id message)))))))
+              (%<- #f actor (message-from message) '*reply*
+                   vals ((actor-msg-id-generator actor))
+                   (message-id message))))))
       (const #t)
       (let ((err (current-error-port)))
         (lambda (key . args)