sym_is_choice(sym) has already been checked by previous if-block:
if (sym_is_choice(sym) || (sym->flags & SYMBOL_NO_WRITE))
continue;
Hence, the following code is redundant, and the comment is misleading:
if (!sym_is_choice(sym))
continue;
/* fall through */
It always takes 'continue', never falls though.
Clean up the dead code.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@gmail.com>
switch (sym->type) {
case S_BOOLEAN:
case S_TRISTATE:
- if (sym->def[S_DEF_USER].tri != sym_get_tristate_value(sym))
- break;
- if (!sym_is_choice(sym))
+ if (sym->def[S_DEF_USER].tri == sym_get_tristate_value(sym))
continue;
- /* fall through */
+ break;
default:
if (!strcmp(sym->curr.val, sym->def[S_DEF_USER].val))
continue;