5 This target takes 2 devices, one to pass all IO to normally, and one to log all
6 of the write operations to. This is intended for file system developers wishing
7 to verify the integrity of metadata or data as the file system is written to.
8 There is a log_write_entry written for every WRITE request and the target is
9 able to take arbitrary data from userspace to insert into the log. The data
10 that is in the WRITE requests is copied into the log to make the replay happen
11 exactly as it happened originally.
16 We log things in order of completion once we are sure the write is no longer in
17 cache. This means that normal WRITE requests are not actually logged until the
18 next REQ_PREFLUSH request. This is to make it easier for userspace to replay
19 the log in a way that correlates to what is on disk and not what is in cache,
20 to make it easier to detect improper waiting/flushing.
22 This works by attaching all WRITE requests to a list once the write completes.
23 Once we see a REQ_PREFLUSH request we splice this list onto the request and once
24 the FLUSH request completes we log all of the WRITEs and then the FLUSH. Only
25 completed WRITEs, at the time the REQ_PREFLUSH is issued, are added in order to
26 simulate the worst case scenario with regard to power failures. Consider the
27 following example (W means write, C means complete):
29 W1,W2,W3,C3,C2,Wflush,C1,Cflush
31 The log would show the following:
35 Again this is to simulate what is actually on disk, this allows us to detect
36 cases where a power failure at a particular point in time would create an
37 inconsistent file system.
39 Any REQ_FUA requests bypass this flushing mechanism and are logged as soon as
40 they complete as those requests will obviously bypass the device cache.
42 Any REQ_OP_DISCARD requests are treated like WRITE requests. Otherwise we would
43 have all the DISCARD requests, and then the WRITE requests and then the FLUSH
44 request. Consider the following example:
46 WRITE block 1, DISCARD block 1, FLUSH
48 If we logged DISCARD when it completed, the replay would look like this:
50 DISCARD 1, WRITE 1, FLUSH
52 which isn't quite what happened and wouldn't be caught during the log replay.
59 log-writes <dev_path> <log_dev_path>
61 ============= ==============================================
62 dev_path Device that all of the IO will go to normally.
63 log_dev_path Device where the log entries are written to.
64 ============= ==============================================
68 <#logged entries> <highest allocated sector>
70 =========================== ========================
71 #logged entries Number of logged entries
72 highest allocated sector Highest allocated sector
73 =========================== ========================
79 You can use a dmsetup message to set an arbitrary mark in a log.
80 For example say you want to fsck a file system after every
81 write, but first you need to replay up to the mkfs to make sure
82 we're fsck'ing something reasonable, you would do something like
85 mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/mapper/log
86 dmsetup message log 0 mark mkfs
89 This would allow you to replay the log up to the mkfs mark and
90 then replay from that point on doing the fsck check in the
91 interval that you want.
93 Every log has a mark at the end labeled "dm-log-writes-end".
98 There is a userspace tool that will replay the log for you in various ways.
99 It can be found here: https://github.com/josefbacik/log-writes
104 Say you want to test fsync on your file system. You would do something like
107 TABLE="0 $(blockdev --getsz /dev/sdb) log-writes /dev/sdb /dev/sdc"
108 dmsetup create log --table "$TABLE"
109 mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/mapper/log
110 dmsetup message log 0 mark mkfs
112 mount /dev/mapper/log /mnt/btrfs-test
113 <some test that does fsync at the end>
114 dmsetup message log 0 mark fsync
115 md5sum /mnt/btrfs-test/foo
116 umount /mnt/btrfs-test
119 replay-log --log /dev/sdc --replay /dev/sdb --end-mark fsync
120 mount /dev/sdb /mnt/btrfs-test
121 md5sum /mnt/btrfs-test/foo
122 <verify md5sum's are correct>
124 Another option is to do a complicated file system operation and verify the file
125 system is consistent during the entire operation. You could do this with:
127 TABLE="0 $(blockdev --getsz /dev/sdb) log-writes /dev/sdb /dev/sdc"
128 dmsetup create log --table "$TABLE"
129 mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/mapper/log
130 dmsetup message log 0 mark mkfs
132 mount /dev/mapper/log /mnt/btrfs-test
133 <fsstress to dirty the fs>
134 btrfs filesystem balance /mnt/btrfs-test
135 umount /mnt/btrfs-test
138 replay-log --log /dev/sdc --replay /dev/sdb --end-mark mkfs
140 replay-log --log /dev/sdc --replay /dev/sdb --start-mark mkfs \
141 --fsck "btrfsck /dev/sdb" --check fua
143 And that will replay the log until it sees a FUA request, run the fsck command
144 and if the fsck passes it will replay to the next FUA, until it is completed or
145 the fsck command exists abnormally.