[ibg.git] / chapters / 14.rst

========================
 Some last lousy points
========================

.. only:: html

  .. image:: /images/picF.png
     :align: left

.. raw:: latex

   \dropcap{f}

inally our three example games are written; we've shown you as much of 
the Inform language as we've needed to, and made a lot of observations 
about how and why something should be done. Despite all that, there's 
much that we've left unsaid, or touched on only lightly. In this chapter 
we'll revisit key topics and review some of the more significant 
omissions, to give you a better feel for what's important, and what can 
be ignored for the time being; when you become an accomplished designer, 
you will decide what matters and what can be left on the shelf.

We'll also talk, in :ref:`reading-other-code`, about a few ways of doing
things that we've chosen not to tell you about, but which you're quite
likely to encounter if you look at Inform code written by other designers.

The tone here is perhaps a little dry, but trust us: in walking this 
dusty ground we touch on just about everything that is fundamental in 
your overall understanding of Inform. And as always, the *Inform 
Designer's Manual* provides rounder and more comprehensive coverage.

Expressions
===========

In this guide we’ve used the placeholder ``expression`` a few times; 
here's roughly what we mean.

* An ``expression`` is a single ``value``, or several ``values`` 
  combined using ``operators`` and sometimes parentheses ``(...)``.

* Possible ``values`` include:

  * a literal number (-32768 to 32767)

  * something that's represented as a number (a character ``'a'`` , a 
    dictionary word ``'aardvark'`` , a string ``"aardvark's adventure"`` 
    or an action ``##Look`` )

  * the internal identifier of a constant, an object, a class or a routine

  * (only in a run-time statement, not in a compile-time directive) the
    contents of a variable, or the return value from a routine.

* Possible ``operators`` include:

  * an arithmetic operator: ``+ - * / % ++``
  * a bitwise logical operator: ``& | ~``
  * a numeric comparison operator: ``== ~= > < >= <=``
  * an object conditional operator: ``ofclass in notin provides has hasnt``
  * a boolean combinational operator: ``&& || ~~``


Internal IDs
============

Many of the items which you define in your source file -- objects, 
variables, routines, etc. -- need to be given a name so that other items 
can refer to them. We call this name an item's internal identifier 
(because it's used only within the source file and isn't visible to the 
player), and we use the placeholders ``obj_id``, ``var_id``, 
``routine_id``, etc. to represent where it's used. An internal ID

* can be up to thirty-two characters long

* must start with a letter or underscore, and then continue with letters 
  ``A-Z`` , underscore ``_`` and digits ``0-9`` (where upper-case and 
  lower-case letters are treated as indistinguishable)

* should generally be unique across all files: your source file, the 
  standard library files, and any library contributions which you've 
  used (except that a routine's local variables are not visible outside 
  that routine).

.. _statements:

Statements
==========

A :term:`statement` is an instruction intended for the interpreter, telling
it what to do at run-time. It *must* be given in lower-case, and always
ends with a semicolon.

Some statements, like ``if``, control one or more other statements. We 
use the placeholder ``statement_block`` to represent either a single 
``statement``, or any number of ``statements`` enclosed in braces:

.. todo::

  We might need some custom syntax highlighting here

.. code-block:: inform

  statement;

  { statement; statement; ... statement; }

Statements that we've met
-------------------------

Our games have used these statements, about half of the Inform 
possibilities:

.. code-block:: inform

  give obj_id attribute;
  give obj_id attribute attribute ... attribute;

  if (expression) statement_block
  if (expression) statement_block else statement_block

  move obj_id to parent_obj_id;

  objectloop (var_id) statement_block

  print value;
  print value, value, ... value;

  print_ret value;
  print_ret value, value, ... value;

  remove obj_id;

  return false;
  return true;

  style underline; print...; style roman;

  switch (expression) {
      value: statement; statement; ... statement;
      ...
      default: statement; statement; ... statement;
  }

  "string";
  "string", value, ... value;

  <action>;
  <action noun>;
  <action noun second>;

  <<action>>;
  <<action noun>>;
  <<action noun second>>;

Statements that we've not met
-----------------------------

Although our example games haven't needed to use them, these looping
statements are sometimes useful:

.. code-block:: inform

  break;
  continue;

  do statement_block until (expression)

  for (set_var : loop_while_expression : update_var) statement_block

  while (expression) statement_block

On the other hand, we suggest that you put the following statements on 
hold for now; they're not immediately relevant to everyday code and have 
mostly to do with printing and formatting:

.. code-block:: inform

  box
  font
  jump
  new_line
  spaces
  string

In particular, avoid using the deprecated jump statement if you possibly can.

Print rules
-----------

In ``print`` and ``print_ret`` statements, each ``value`` can be:

* a numeric ``expression``, displayed as a signed decimal number,

* a ``"string"``, displayed literally, or

* a print rule. You can create your own, or use a standard one, including:

  .. tabularcolumns:: ll

  +-------------------------+---------------------------------------------------+
  | ``(a) obj_id``          | the object's name, preceded by "a", "an" or "some"|
  +-------------------------+---------------------------------------------------+
  | ``(A) obj_id``          | as ``(a)`` but using "A", "An" or "Some"          |
  +-------------------------+---------------------------------------------------+
  | ``(the) obj_id``        | the object's name, preceded by "the"              |
  +-------------------------+---------------------------------------------------+
  | ``(The) obj_id``        | as ``(the)`` but using "The"                      |       
  +-------------------------+---------------------------------------------------+
  | ``(number) expression`` | the numeric expression's value in words           |
  +-------------------------+---------------------------------------------------+


Directives
==========

A :term:`directive` is an instruction intended for the compiler, telling it
what to do at compile-time, while the source file is being translated into
Z-code. By convention it's given an initial capital letter (though the
compiler doesn't enforce this) and always ends with a semicolon.

Directives that we've met
-------------------------

We've used all of these directives; note that for ``Class``, ``Extend``, 
``Object`` and ``Verb`` the full supported syntax is more sophisticated 
than the basic form presented here:

.. code-block:: inform

  Class   class_id
    with  property  value,
          property  value,
          ...
          property  value,
    has   attribute  attribute  ...  attribute;

  Constant  const_id:
  Constant  const_id = expression;
  Constant  const_id expression;

  Extend 'verb'
      * token  token  ...  token -> action
      * token  token  ...  token -> action
      ...
      * token  token  ...  token -> action

  Include "filename";

  Object  obj_id  "external_name"  parent_obj_id
    with  property  value,
          property  value,
          ...
          property  value,
    has   attribute  attribute  ... attribute;

  Release  expression;

  Replace  routine_id;

  Serial "yymmdd";

  Verb  'verb'
      * token  token  ...  token -> action
      * token  token  ...  token -> action
      ...
      * token  token  ...  token -> action;

  ! comment text which the compiler ignores

  [ routine_id;  statement;  statement; ... statement;  ];

  #Ifdef  any_id;  ... #Endif;

Directives that we've not met
-----------------------------

There's only a handful of useful directives which we haven't needed to 
use:

.. code-block:: inform

  Attribute attribute;

  Global var_id;
  Global var_id = expression;

  Property property;

  Statusline score;
  Statusline time;

but there's a whole load which are of fairly low importance for now:

.. code-block:: inform

  Abbreviate
  Array
  Default
  End
  Ifndef
  Ifnot
  Iftrue
  Iffalse
  Import
  Link
  Lowstring
  Message
  Switches
  System_file
  Zcharacter

.. _objects:

Objects
=======

An object is really just a collection of variables which together 
represent the capabilities and current status of some specific component 
of the model world. Full variables are called properties; simpler 
two-state variables are attributes.

Properties
----------

The library defines around forty-eight standard property variables (such 
as ``before`` or ``name``), but you can readily create further ones just 
by using them within an object definition.

You can create and initialise a property in an object's ``with`` segment:

.. code-block:: inform

  property,                             ! set to zero / false

  property value,                       ! set to a single value

  property value value ... value,       ! set to a list of values

In each case, the ``value`` is either a compile-time ``expression``, or 
an embedded routine:

.. code-block:: inform

  property expression,

  property [; statement; statement; ... statement; ],


You can refer to the value of a property:

.. code-block:: inform

  self.property                         ! only within that same object

  obj_id.property                       ! everywhere

and you can test whether an object definition includes a given property:

.. code-block:: inform

  (obj_id provides property)            ! is true or false

.. _routines:

Routines
========

Inform provides standalone routines and embedded routines.

Standalone routines
-------------------

Standalone routines are defined like this:

.. code-block:: inform

  [ routine_id; statement; statement; ... statement; ];

and called like this:

.. code-block:: inform

  routine_id()

Embedded routines
-----------------

These are embedded as the value of an object's property:

.. code-block:: inform

  property [; statement; statement; ... statement; ],

and are usually called automatically by the library, or manually by:

.. code-block:: inform

  self.property()                       ! only within that same object

  obj_id.property()                     ! everywhere

Arguments and local variables
-----------------------------

Both types of routine support up to fifteen local variables -- variables 
which can be used only by the statements within the routine, and which 
are automatically initialised to zero every time that the routine is 
called:

.. code-block:: inform

  [ routine_id var_id var_id ... var_id; statement; statement; ... statement; ];

  property [ var_id var_id ... var_id; statement; statement; ... statement; ],

You can pass up to seven arguments to a routine, by listing those 
arguments within the parentheses when you call the routine. The effect 
is simply to initialise the matching local variables to the argument 
values rather than to zero:

.. code-block:: inform

  routine_id(expression, expression, ... expression)

Although it works, this technique is rarely used with embedded routines, 
because there is no mechanism for the library to supply argument values 
when calling the routine.

Return values
-------------

Every routine returns a single value, which is supplied either 
explicitly by some form of return statement:

.. code-block:: inform

  [ routine_id; statement; statement; ... return expr; ]; ! returns expr

  property [; statement; statement; ... return expr; ], ! returns expr

or implicitly when the routine runs out of statements. If none of these 
``statements`` is one -- ``return``, ``print_ret``, ``"..."` or 
``<<...>>`` -- that causes an explicit return, then:

.. code-block:: inform

  [ routine_id; statement; statement; ... statement; ];

returns ``true`` and

.. code-block:: inform

  property [; statement; statement; ... statement; ]

return ``false``.

This difference is *important*. Remember it by the letter pairs STEF: 
left to themselves, Standalone routines return True, Embedded routines 
return False.

Here's an example standalone routine which returns the larger of its two
argument values:

.. code-block:: inform

  [ Max a b; if (a > b) return a; else return b; ];

and here are some examples of its use (note that the first example, 
though legal, does nothing useful whatsoever):

.. code-block:: inform

  Max(x,y);

  x = Max(2,3);

  if (Max(x,7) == 7) ...

  switch (Max(3,y)) { ...

Library routines versus entry points
------------------------------------

A library routine is a standard routine, included within the library 
files, which you can optionally call from your source file if you 
require the functionality which the routine provides. We've mentioned 
these library routines:

.. code-block:: inform

  IndirectlyContains(parent_obj_id, obj_id)

  PlaceInScope(obj_id)

  PlayerTo(obj_id, flag)

  StartDaemon(obj_id)

  StopDaemon(obj_id)


By contrast, an entry point routine is a routine which you can provide 
in your source file, in which case the library calls it at an 
appropriate time. We've mentioned these optional entry point routines:

.. code-block:: inform

  DeathMessage()

  InScope(actor_obj_id)

And this, the only mandatory one:

.. code-block:: inform

  Initialise()

There are full lists in :ref:`library-routines` and :ref:`entry-points`.

.. _reading-other-code:

Reading other people's code
===========================

Right at the start of this guide, we warned you that we weren't setting 
out to be comprehensive; we've concentrated on presenting the most 
important aspects of Inform, as clearly as we can. However, when you 
read the *Inform Designer's* Manual, and more especially when you look 
at complete games or library extensions which other designers have 
produced, you'll come across other ways of doing things -- and it might 
be that you, like other authors, prefer them over our methods. Just try 
to find a style that suits you and, this is the important bit, be 
*consistent* about its use. In this section, we highlight some of the 
more obvious differences which you may encounter.

Code layout
-----------

Every designer has his or her own style for laying out their source 
code, and they're all worse than the one you adopt. Inform's flexibility 
makes it easy for designers to choose a style that suits them; 
unfortunately, for some designers this choice seems influenced by the 
Jackson Pollock school of art. We've advised you to be consistent, to 
use plenty of white space and indentation, to choose sensible names, to 
add comments at difficult sections, to actively *think*, as you write 
your code, about making it as readable as you can.

This is doubly true if you ever contemplate sharing a library extension 
with the rest of the community. This example, with the name changed, is 
from a file in the Archive:

.. code-block:: inform

  [xxxx i j;
  if (j==0) rtrue;
  if (i in player) rtrue;
  if (i has static || (i has scenery)) rtrue;
  action=##linktake;
  if (runroutines(j,before) ~= 0 || (j has static || (j has scenery))) {
  print "You'll have to disconnect ",(the) i," from ",(the) j," first.^";
  rtrue;
  }
  else {
  if (runroutines(i,before)~=0 || (i has static || (i has scenery))) {
  print "You'll have to disconnect ",(the) i," from ",(the) j," first.^";
  rtrue;
  }
  else
  if (j hasnt concealed && j hasnt static) move j to player;
  if (i hasnt static && i hasnt concealed) move i to player;
  action=##linktake;
  if (runroutines(j,after) ~= 0) rtrue;
  print "You take ",(the) i," and ",(the) j," connected to it.^";
  rtrue;
  }
  ];

Here's the same routine after a few minutes spent purely on making it 
more comprehensible; we haven't actually tested that it (still) works, 
though that second ``else`` looks suspicious:

.. code-block:: inform

  [ xxxx i j;
      if (i in player || i has static or scenery || j == nothing) return true;
      action = ##LinkTake;
      if (RunRoutines(j,before) || j has static or scenery)
          "You'll have to disconnect ", (the) i, " from ", (the) j, " first.";
      else {
          if (RunRoutines(i,before) || i has static or scenery)
              "You'll have to disconnect ", (the) i, " from ", (the) j, " first.";
          else
              if (j hasnt static or concealed) move j to player;
          if (i hasnt static or concealed) move i to player;
          if (RunRoutines(j,after)) return true;
          "You take ", (the) i, " and ", (the) j, " connected to it.";
      }
  ];

We hope you'll agree that the result was worth the tiny extra effort. 
Code gets written once; it gets read dozens and dozens of times.

Shortcuts
---------

There are a few statement shortcuts, some more useful than others, which 
you'll come across.

* These five lines all do the same thing:

  .. code-block:: inform

    return true;
    return 1;
    return;
    rtrue;
    ];          ! at the end of a standalone routine

* These four lines all do the same thing:

  .. code-block:: inform

    return false;
    return 0;
    rfalse;
    ];          ! at the end of an embedded routine

* These four lines all do the same thing:

  .. code-block:: inform

    print "string"; new_line; return true;
    print "string^"; return true;
    print_ret "string";
    "string";

* These lines are the same:

  .. code-block:: inform

    print value1; print value2; print value3;
    print value1, value2, value3;

* These lines are the same:

  .. code-block:: inform

    <action noun second>; return true;
    <<action noun second>>;

* These lines are also the same:

  .. code-block:: inform

    print "^";
    new_line;

* These ``if`` statements are equivalent:

  .. code-block:: inform

    if (MyVar == 1 || MyVar == 3 || MyVar == 7) ...

    if (MyVar == 1 or 3 or 7) ...

* These ``if`` statements are equivalent as well:

  .. code-block:: inform

    if (MyVar ~= 1 && MyVar ~= 3 && MyVar ~= 7) ...
    if (MyVar ~= 1 or 3 or 7) ...

* In an ``if`` statement, the thing in parentheses can be *any* 
  expression; all that matters is its value: zero (false) or anything 
  else (true). For example, these statements are equivalent:

  .. code-block:: inform

    if (MyVar ~= false) ...
    if (~~(MyVar == false)) ...
    if (MyVar ~= 0) ...
    if (~~(MyVar == 0)) ...
    if (MyVar) ...

  Note that the following statement specifically tests whether ``MyVar`` 
  contains ``true`` (1), *not* whether its value is anything other than 
  zero.

  .. code-block:: inform

    if (MyVar == true) ...

* If ``MyVar`` is a variable, the statements ``MyVar++;`` and 
  ``++MyVar;`` work the same as ``MyVar = MyVar + 1;`` For example, 
  these lines are equivalent:

  .. code-block:: inform

    MyVar = MyVar + 1; if (MyVar == 3) ...
    if (++MyVar == 3) ...
    if (MyVar++ == 2) ...

  What's the same about ``MyVar++`` and ``++MyVar`` is that they both 
  add one to ``MyVar``. What's different about them is the value to 
  which the construct itself evaluates: ``MyVar++`` returns the current 
  value of ``MyVar`` and then performs the increment, whereas 
  ``++MyVar`` does the "+1" first and then returns the incremented 
  value. In the example, if ``MyVar`` currently contains 2 then 
  ``++MyVar`` returns 3 and ``MyVar++`` returns 2, even though in both 
  cases the value of ``MyVar`` afterwards is 3. As another example, 
  this code (from Helga in "William Tell"):

  .. code-block:: inform

    Talk: self.times_spoken_to = self.times_spoken_to + 1;
        switch (self.times_spoken_to) {
            1: score = score + 1;
               print_ret "You warmly thank Helga for the apple.";
            2: print_ret "~See you again soon.~";
            default: return false;
        }
    ],

  could have been written more succinctly like this:

  .. code-block:: inform

    Talk: switch (++self.times_spoken_to) {
        1: score++;
           print_ret "You warmly thank Helga for the apple.";
        2: print_ret "~See you again soon.~";
        default: return false;
        }
    ],

* Similarly, the statements ``MyVar--;`` and ``--MyVar;`` work the same 
  as ``MyVar = MyVar - 1;`` Again, these lines are equivalent:

  .. code-block:: inform

    MyVar = MyVar - 1; if (MyVar == 7) ...
    if (--MyVar == 7) ...
    if (MyVar-- == 8) ...

"number" property and "general" attribute
-----------------------------------------

The library defines a standard ``number`` property and a standard 
``general`` attribute, whose roles are undefined: they are 
general-purpose variables available within every object to designers as 
and when they desire.

We recommend that you avoid using these two variables, primarily because 
their names are, by their very nature, so bland as to be largely 
meaningless. Your game will be clearer and easier to debug if you 
instead create new property variables -- with appropriate names -- as 
part of your ``Object`` and ``Class`` definitions.

.. _common-props:

Common properties and attributes
--------------------------------

As an alternative to creating new individual properties which apply only to
a single object (or class of objects), it's possible to devise properties
and new attributes which, like those defined by the library, are available
on *all* objects. The need to do this is actually quite rare, and is mostly
confined to library extensions (for example, the ``pname.h`` extension
which we encountered in :doc:`12` gives every object a ``pname`` property
and a ``phrase_matched`` attribute). To create them, you would use these
directives near the start of your source file:

.. code-block:: inform

  Attribute attribute;

  Property property;

We recommend that you avoid using these two directives unless you really 
do need to affect every object -- or at least the majority of them -- in 
your game. There is a limit of forty-eight attributes (of which the 
library currently defines around thirty) and sixty-two of these common 
properties (of which the library currently defines around forty-eight). 
On the other hand, the number of individual properties which you can add 
is virtually unlimited.

.. _setting-up-tree:

Setting up the object tree
--------------------------

Throughout this guide, we've defined the initial position of each object 
within the overall object tree either by explicitly mentioning its 
parent's ``obj_id`` (if any) in the first line of the object definition 
-- what we've been calling the header information -- or, for a few 
objects which crop up in more than one place, by using their 
``found_in`` properties. For example, in "William Tell" we defined 
twenty-seven objects; omitting those which used ``found_in`` to define 
their placement at the start of the game, we're left with object 
definitions starting like this:

.. code-block:: inform

  Room    street "A street in Altdorf"        

  Room    below_square "Further along the street"
  Furniture   stall "fruit and vegetable stall" below_square
  Prop    "potatoes" below_square
  Prop    "fruit and vegetables" below_square
  NPC     stallholder "Helga" below_square

  Room    south_square "South side of the square"

  Room    mid_square "Middle of the square"
  Furniture   pole "hat on a pole" mid_square

  Room    north_square "North side of the square"

  Room    marketplace "Marketplace near the square"
  Object  tree "lime tree" marketplace
  NPC     governor "governor" marketplace

  Object  bow "bow"

  Object  quiver "quiver"
  Arrow   "arrow" quiver
  Arrow   "arrow" quiver
  Arrow   "arrow" quiver

  Object  apple "apple"

You'll see that several of the objects begin the game as parents: 
``below_square``, ``mid_square``, ``marketplace`` and ``quiver`` all 
have child objects beneath them; those children mention their parent as 
the last item of header information.

There's an alternative object syntax which is available to achieve the 
same object tree, using "arrows". That is, we could have defined those 
parent-and-child objects as:

.. code-block:: inform

  Room    below_square "Further along the street"
  Furniture -> stall "fruit and vegetable stall"
  Prop      -> "potatoes"
  Prop      -> "fruit and vegetables"
  NPC       -> stallholder "Helga"

  Room      mid_square "Middle of the square"
  Furniture   -> pole "hat on a pole"

  Room      marketplace "Marketplace near the square"
  Object    -> tree "lime tree"
  NPC       -> governor "governor"

  Object    quiver "quiver"
  Arrow     -> "arrow"
  Arrow     -> "arrow"
  Arrow     -> "arrow"

The idea is that an object's header information *either* starts with an 
arrow, or ends with an ``obj_id``, or has neither (having both isn’t 
permitted). An object with neither has no parent: in this example, 
that's all the ``Rooms``, and also the ``bow`` and the ``quiver`` (which 
are moved to the player ``object`` in the ``Initialise`` routine) and 
the apple (which remains without a parent until Helga gives it to 
William).

An object which starts with a single arrow ``->`` is defined to be a 
child of the nearest previous object without a parent. Thus, for 
example, the ``tree`` and ``governor`` objects are both children of the 
``marketplace``. To define a child of a child, you'd use two arrows
``-> ->``, and so on. In "William Tell", that situation doesn't occur; 
to illustrate how it works, imagine that at the start of the game the 
potatoes and the other fruit and vegetables where actually *on* the 
stall. Then we might have used:

.. code-block:: inform

  Room    below_square "Further along the street"
  Furniture ->  stall "fruit and vegetable stall"
  Prop    ->  -> "potatoes"
  Prop    ->  -> "fruit and vegetables"
  NPC     -> stallholder "Helga"
  ...

That is, the objects with one arrow (the ``stall`` and ``stallholder``) 
are children of the nearest object without a parent (the ``Room``), and 
the objects with two arrows (the produce) are children of the nearest 
object defined with a single arrow (the ``stall``).

The advantages of using arrows include:

* You're forced to define your objects in a "sensible" order.

* Fewer ``obj_ids`` may need to be used (though in this game it would 
  make no difference).

The disadvantages include:

* The fact that objects are related by the physical juxtaposition of 
  their definitions is not necessarily intuitive to all designers.

* Especially in a crowded room, it’s harder to be certain exactly how 
  the various parent–child relationships are initialised, other than by 
  carefully counting lots of arrows.

* If you relocate the parent within the initial object hierarchy to a 
  higher or lower level, you'll need also to change its children by 
  adding or removing arrows; this isn't necessary when the parent is 
  named in the child headers.

We prefer to explicitly name the parent, but you'll encounter both forms 
very regularly.

Quotes in "name" properties
---------------------------

We went to some lengths, way back in :ref:`things-in-quotes`, to explain
the difference between double quotes ``"..."`` (strings to be output) and
single quotes ``'...'`` (input tokens -- dictionary words).  Perhaps
somewhat unfortunately, Inform allows you to blur this clean distinction:
you can use double quotes in name properties and Verb directives:

.. code-block:: inform

  NPC     stallholder "Helga" below_square
    with  name "stallholder" "greengrocer" "monger" "shopkeeper" "merchant"
              "owner" "Helga" "dress" "scarf" "headscarf",
  ...

  Verb "talk" "t//" "converse" "chat" "gossip"
      * "to"/"with" creature          -> Talk
      * creature                      -> Talk;

*Please* don't do this. You'll just confuse yourself: those are 
dictionary words, not strings; it's just as easy -- and far clearer -- 
to stick rigidly to the preferred punctuation.

Obsolete usages
---------------

Finally, remember that Inform has been evolving since 1993. Over that 
time, Graham has taken considerable care to maintain as much 
compatibility as possible, so that games written years ago, for earlier 
versions of the compiler and the library, will still compile today. 
While generally a good thing, this brings the disadvantage that a 
certain amount of obsolete baggage is still lying around. You may, for 
example, see games using ``Nearby`` directives (denotes parentage, 
roughly the same as ``->``) and ``near`` conditions (roughly, having the 
same parent), or with ``" \ "`` controlling line breaks in long 
``print`` statements. Try to understand them; try *not* to use them.