From: Christopher Allan Webber Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 17:20:40 +0000 (-0600) Subject: Add catching exceptions, and lots of much needed docuemntation X-Git-Tag: v0.1.0~63 X-Git-Url: https://jxself.org/git/?p=8sync.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=496f85495101750b469bd2b30b37db0ba02aca7f Add catching exceptions, and lots of much needed docuemntation --- diff --git a/eightsync/agenda.scm b/eightsync/agenda.scm index 15220d7..a965a2c 100644 --- a/eightsync/agenda.scm +++ b/eightsync/agenda.scm @@ -466,16 +466,42 @@ return the wrong thing via (%8sync) and trip themselves up." "Invalid request passed back via an (%8sync) procedure." async-request)))) +(define-record-type + (make-wrapped-exception key args stack) + wrapped-exception? + (key wrapped-exception-key) + (args wrapped-exception-args) + (stack wrapped-exception-stack)) + (define-syntax-rule (%run body ...) (%run-at body ... #f)) (define-syntax-rule (%run-at body ... when) + ;; Send an asynchronous request to apply a continuation to the + ;; following function, then handle that as a request to the agenda (make-async-request (lambda (kont) + ;; We're making a run request (make-run-request + ;; Wrapping the following execution to run... (wrap + ;; Once we get the result from the inner part, we'll resume + ;; this continuation, but first + ;; @@: Is this running immediately, or queueing the result + ;; after evaluation for the next agenda tick? It looks + ;; like evaluating immediately. Is that what we want? (kont - (begin body ...))) + ;; Any unhandled errors are caught + (catch #t + ;; Run the actual code the user requested + (lambda () + body ...) + ;; If something bad happened and we didn't catch it, + ;; we'll wrap it up in such a way that the continuation + ;; can address it + (lambda (key . args) + (make-wrapped-exception key args + (make-stack #t 1 0)))))) when)))) (define-syntax-rule (%run-delay body ... delay-time)