X-Git-Url: https://jxself.org/git/?p=8sync.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=loopy.scm;h=5477af677f65d7e8464eb3af686e1a1b591484c8;hp=0f6edc569d5f3a02768096ab05c666816815d4d2;hb=9ed57ce7714e4228941d689aa717196d3280db43;hpb=8ef593dc9802e11f3222ab81e021e8807fd8bdb9 diff --git a/loopy.scm b/loopy.scm index 0f6edc5..5477af6 100644 --- a/loopy.scm +++ b/loopy.scm @@ -1,50 +1,498 @@ -(use-modules (srfi srfi-9) - (srfi srfi-9 gnu) - (ice-9 q) - (ice-9 match)) +(define-module (loopy agenda) + #:use-module (srfi srfi-1) + #:use-module (srfi srfi-9) + #:use-module (srfi srfi-9 gnu) + #:use-module (ice-9 q) + #:use-module (ice-9 match) + #:use-module (ice-9 receive) + #:export ( + make-agenda agenda? + agenda-queue agenda-prompt-tag + agenda-read-port-map agenda-write-port-map agenda-except-port-map + agenda-schedule + + make-async-prompt-tag + + + make-time-segment time-segment? + time-segment-time time-segment-queue + + time< time= time<= time-delta+ + time-minus time-plus + + + make-time-delta tdelta time-delta? + time-delta-sec time-delta-usec + + + make-schedule schedule? + schedule-add! schedule-empty? + schedule-segments + schedule-soonest-time + + schedule-segments-split schedule-extract-until! + add-segments-contents-to-queue! + + + make-run-request run-request? + run-request-proc run-request-when + + run wrap run-wrap run-wrap-at + + %current-agenda + start-agenda agenda-run-once)) ;; @@: Using immutable agendas here, so wouldn't it make sense to -;; replace this +;; replace this queue stuff with using pfds based immutable queues? + + +;;; Agenda definition +;;; ================= + +;;; The agenda consists of: +;;; - a queue of immediate items to handle +;;; - sheduled future events to be added to a future queue +;;; - a tag by which running processes can escape for some asynchronous +;;; operation (from which they can be returned later) +;;; - a mapping of ports to various handler procedures +;;; +;;; The goal, eventually, is for this all to be immutable and functional. +;;; However, we aren't there yet. Some tricky things: +;;; - The schedule needs to be immutable, yet reasonably efficient. +;;; - Need to use immutable queues (ijp's pfds library?) +;;; - Modeling reading from ports as something repeatable, +;;; and with reasonable separation from functional components? (define-immutable-record-type - (make-agenda-intern queue) + (make-agenda-intern queue prompt-tag + read-port-map write-port-map except-port-map + schedule time) agenda? - (queue agenda-queue)) + (queue agenda-queue) + (prompt-tag agenda-prompt-tag) + (read-port-map agenda-read-port-map) + (write-port-map agenda-write-port-map) + (except-port-map agenda-except-port-map) + (schedule agenda-schedule) + (time agenda-time)) + +(define (make-async-prompt-tag) + (make-prompt-tag "prompt")) + +(define* (make-agenda #:key + (queue (make-q)) + (prompt (make-prompt-tag)) + (read-port-map (make-hash-table)) + (write-port-map (make-hash-table)) + (except-port-map (make-hash-table)) + (schedule (make-schedule)) + (time (gettimeofday))) + (make-agenda-intern queue prompt + read-port-map write-port-map except-port-map + schedule time)) + + + +;;; Schedule +;;; ======== + +;;; This is where we handle timed events for the future + +;; This section totally borrows from the ideas in SICP +;; <3 <3 <3 + +;; NOTE: time is a cons of (seconds . microseconds) + +(define-record-type + (make-time-segment-intern time queue) + time-segment? + (time time-segment-time) + (queue time-segment-queue)) + +(define (time-segment-right-format time) + (match time + ;; time is already a cons of second and microsecnd + (((? integer? s) . (? integer? u)) time) + ;; time was just an integer (just the second) + ((? integer? _) (cons time 0)) + (_ (throw 'invalid-time "Invalid time" time)))) + +(define* (make-time-segment time #:optional (queue (make-q))) + (make-time-segment-intern time queue)) + +(define (time< time1 time2) + (cond ((< (car time1) + (car time2)) + #t) + ((and (= (car time1) + (car time2)) + (< (cdr time1) + (cdr time2))) + #t) + (else #f))) + +(define (time= time1 time2) + (and (= (car time1) (car time2)) + (= (cdr time1) (cdr time2)))) + +(define (time<= time1 time2) + (or (time< time1 time2) + (time= time1 time2))) + + +(define-record-type + (make-time-delta-intern sec usec) + time-delta? + (sec time-delta-sec) + (usec time-delta-usec)) + +(define* (make-time-delta sec #:optional usec) + (make-time-delta-intern sec (or usec 0))) + +(define tdelta make-time-delta) + +(define (time-carry-correct time) + "Corrects/handles time microsecond carry. +Will produce (0 . 0) instead of a negative number, if needed." + (cond ((>= (cdr time) 1000000) + (cons + (+ (car time) 1) + (- (cdr time) 1000000))) + ((< (cdr time) 0) + (if (= (car time) 0) + '(0 0) + (cons + (- (car time) 1) + (+ (cdr time) 1000000)))) + (else time))) + +(define (time-delta+ time time-delta) + (time-carry-correct + (cons (+ (car time) (time-delta-sec time-delta)) + (+ (cdr time) (time-delta-usec time-delta))))) + +(define (time-minus time1 time2) + (time-carry-correct + (cons (- (car time1) (car time2)) + (- (cdr time2) (cdr time2))))) + +(define (time-plus time1 time2) + (time-carry-correct + (cons (+ (car time1) (car time2)) + (+ (cdr time2) (cdr time2))))) + -(define* (make-agenda #:key (queue (make-q))) - (make-agenda-intern queue)) +(define-record-type + (make-schedule-intern segments) + schedule? + (segments schedule-segments set-schedule-segments!)) + +(define* (make-schedule #:optional segments) + (make-schedule-intern (or segments '()))) + +(define (schedule-soonest-time schedule) + "Return a cons of (sec . usec) for next time segement, or #f if none" + (let ((segments (schedule-segments schedule))) + (if (eq? segments '()) + #f + (time-segment-time (car segments))))) + +;; TODO: This code is reasonably easy to read but it +;; mutates AND is worst case of O(n) in both space and time :( +;; but at least it'll be reasonably easy to refactor to +;; a more functional setup? +(define (schedule-add! schedule time proc) + (let ((time (time-segment-right-format time))) + (define (new-time-segment) + (let ((new-segment + (make-time-segment time))) + (enq! (time-segment-queue new-segment) proc) + new-segment)) + (define (loop segments) + (define (segment-equals-time? segment) + (time= time (time-segment-time segment))) + + (define (segment-more-than-time? segment) + (time< time (time-segment-time segment))) + + ;; We could switch this out to be more mutate'y + ;; and avoid the O(n) of space... is that over-optimizing? + (match segments + ;; If we're at the end of the list, time to make a new + ;; segment... + ('() (cons (new-time-segment) '())) + ;; If the segment's time is exactly our time, good news + ;; everyone! Let's append our stuff to its queue + (((? segment-equals-time? first) rest ...) + (enq! (time-segment-queue first) proc) + segments) + ;; If the first segment is more than our time, + ;; ours belongs before this one, so add it and + ;; start consing our way back + (((? segment-more-than-time? first) rest ...) + (cons (new-time-segment) segments)) + ;; Otherwise, build up recursive result + ((first rest ... ) + (cons first (loop rest))))) + (set-schedule-segments! + schedule + (loop (schedule-segments schedule))))) + +(define (schedule-empty? schedule) + (eq? (schedule-segments schedule) '())) + +(define (schedule-segments-split schedule time) + "Does a multiple value return of time segments before/at and after TIME" + (let ((time (time-segment-right-format time))) + (define (segment-is-now? segment) + (time= (time-segment-time segment) time)) + (define (segment-is-before-now? segment) + (time< (time-segment-time segment) time)) + + (let loop ((segments-before '()) + (segments-left (schedule-segments schedule))) + (match segments-left + ;; end of the line, return + ('() + (values (reverse segments-before) '())) + + ;; It's right now, so time to stop, but include this one in before + ;; but otherwise return + (((? segment-is-now? first) rest ...) + (values (reverse (cons first segments-before)) rest)) + + ;; This is prior or at now, so add it and keep going + (((? segment-is-before-now? first) rest ...) + (loop (cons first segments-before) rest)) + + ;; Otherwise it's past now, just return what we have + (segments-after + (values segments-before segments-after)))))) + +(define (schedule-extract-until! schedule time) + "Extract all segments until TIME from SCHEDULE, and pop old segments off" + (receive (segments-before segments-after) + (schedule-segments-split schedule time) + (set-schedule-segments! schedule segments-after) + segments-before)) + +(define (add-segments-contents-to-queue! segments queue) + (for-each + (lambda (segment) + (let ((seg-queue (time-segment-queue segment))) + (while (not (q-empty? seg-queue)) + (enq! queue (deq! seg-queue))))) + segments)) + + + +;;; Port handling +;;; ============= + +(define (make-port-mapping) + (make-hash-table)) + +(define* (port-mapping-set! port-mapping port #:optional read write except) + "Sets port-mapping for reader / writer / exception handlers" + (if (not (or read write except)) + (throw 'no-handlers-given "No handlers given for port" port)) + (hashq-set! port-mapping port + `#(,read ,write ,except))) + +(define (port-mapping-remove! port-mapping port) + (hashq-remove! port-mapping port)) + +;; TODO: This is O(n), I'm pretty sure :\ +;; ... it might be worthwhile for us to have a +;; port-mapping record that keeps a count of how many +;; handlers (maybe via a promise?) +(define (port-mapping-empty? port-mapping) + "Is this port mapping empty?" + (eq? (hash-count (const #t) port-mapping) 0)) + +(define (port-mapping-non-empty? port-mapping) + "Whether this port-mapping contains any elements" + (not (port-mapping-empty? port-mapping))) + + + +;;; Request to run stuff +;;; ==================== + +(define-record-type + (make-run-request proc when) + run-request? + (proc run-request-proc) + (when run-request-when)) + +(define* (run proc #:optional when) + (make-run-request proc when)) + +(define-syntax-rule (wrap body ...) + (lambda () + body ...)) + +(define-syntax-rule (run-wrap body ...) + (run (wrap body ...))) + +(define-syntax-rule (run-wrap-at body ... when) + (run (wrap body ...) when)) + + +;;; Execution of agenda, and current agenda +;;; ======================================= (define %current-agenda (make-parameter #f)) -(define* (start-agenda agenda #:optional stop-condition) +(define (update-agenda-from-select! agenda) + (define (hash-keys hash) + (hash-map->list (lambda (k v) k) hash)) + (define (get-wait-time) + ;; TODO: we need to figure this out based on whether there's anything + ;; in the queue, and if not, how long till the next scheduled item + (let ((soonest-time (schedule-soonest-time (agenda-schedule agenda)))) + (cond + ((not (q-empty? (agenda-queue agenda))) + (cons 0 0)) + (soonest-time ; ie, the agenda is non-empty + (let* ((current-time (agenda-time agenda))) + (if (time<= soonest-time current-time) + ;; Well there's something due so let's select + ;; (this avoids a (possible?) race condition chance) + (cons 0 0) + (time-minus soonest-time current-time)))) + (else + (cons #f #f))))) + (define (do-select) + ;; TODO: support usecond wait time too + (match (get-wait-time) + ((sec . usec) + (select (hash-keys (agenda-read-port-map agenda)) + (hash-keys (agenda-write-port-map agenda)) + (hash-keys (agenda-except-port-map agenda)) + sec usec)))) + (define (get-procs-to-run) + (define (ports->procs ports port-map) + (lambda (initial-procs) + (fold + (lambda (port prev) + (cons (lambda () + ((hash-ref port-map port) port)) + prev)) + initial-procs + ports))) + (match (do-select) + ((read-ports write-ports except-ports) + ;; @@: Come on, we can do better than append ;P + ((compose (ports->procs + read-ports + (agenda-read-port-map agenda)) + (ports->procs + write-ports + (agenda-write-port-map agenda)) + (ports->procs + except-ports + (agenda-except-port-map agenda))) + '())))) + (define (update-agenda) + (let ((procs-to-run (get-procs-to-run)) + (q (agenda-queue agenda))) + (for-each + (lambda (proc) + (enq! q proc)) + procs-to-run)) + agenda) + (define (ports-to-select?) + (define (has-items? selector) + ;; @@: O(n) + ;; ... we could use hash-for-each and a continuation to jump + ;; out with a #t at first indication of an item + (not (= (hash-count (const #t) + (selector agenda)) + 0))) + (or (has-items? agenda-read-port-map) + (has-items? agenda-write-port-map) + (has-items? agenda-except-port-map))) + + (if (ports-to-select?) + (update-agenda) + agenda)) + + +(define* (start-agenda agenda + #:key stop-condition + (get-time gettimeofday) + (handle-ports update-agenda-from-select!)) (let loop ((agenda agenda)) - (let ((new-agenda + (let ((agenda + ;; @@: Hm, maybe here would be a great place to handle + ;; select'ing on ports. + ;; We could compose over agenda-run-once and agenda-read-ports (parameterize ((%current-agenda agenda)) (agenda-run-once agenda)))) - (if (and stop-condition (stop-condition)) + (if (and stop-condition (stop-condition agenda)) 'done - (loop new-agenda))))) + (let* ((new-time (get-time)) + (agenda + (handle-ports + ;; Adjust the agenda's time just in time + ;; We do this here rather than in agenda-run-once to make + ;; agenda-run-once's behavior fairly predictable + (set-field agenda (agenda-time) new-time)))) + ;; Update the agenda's current queue based on + ;; currently applicable time segments + (add-segments-contents-to-queue! + (schedule-extract-until! (agenda-schedule agenda) new-time) + (agenda-queue agenda)) + (loop agenda)))))) (define (agenda-run-once agenda) "Run once through the agenda, and produce a new agenda based on the results" + (define (call-proc proc) + (call-with-prompt + (agenda-prompt-tag agenda) + (lambda () + (proc)) + ;; TODO + (lambda (k) k))) + (let ((queue (agenda-queue agenda)) (next-queue (make-q))) (while (not (q-empty? queue)) (let* ((proc (q-pop! queue)) - (proc-result (proc)) + (proc-result (call-proc proc)) (enqueue - (lambda (new-proc) - (enq! next-queue new-proc)))) + (lambda (run-request) + (define (schedule-at! time proc) + (schedule-add! (agenda-schedule agenda) time proc)) + (let ((request-time (run-request-when run-request))) + (match request-time + ((? time-delta? time-delta) + (let ((time (time-delta+ (agenda-time agenda) + time-delta))) + (schedule-at! time (run-request-proc run-request)))) + ((? integer? sec) + (let ((time (cons sec 0))) + (schedule-at! time (run-request-proc run-request)))) + (((? integer? sec) . (? integer? usec)) + (schedule-at! request-time (run-request-proc run-request))) + (#f + (enq! next-queue (run-request-proc run-request)))))))) ;; @@: We might support delay-wrapped procedures here (match proc-result - ((? procedure? new-proc) + ;; TODO: replace procedure with something that indicates + ;; intent to run. Use a (run foo) procedure + ((? run-request? new-proc) (enqueue new-proc)) - (((? procedure? new-procs) ...) + (((? run-request? new-procs) ...) (for-each (lambda (new-proc) (enqueue new-proc)) - new-procs))))) - ;; TODO: Selecting on ports would happen here? + new-procs)) + ;; do nothing + (_ #f)))) + ;; TODO: Alternately, we could return the next-queue + ;; along with changes to be added to the schedule here? ;; Return new agenda, with next queue set (set-field agenda (agenda-queue) next-queue)))