X-Git-Url: https://jxself.org/git/?p=8sync.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=8sync%2Fagenda.scm;h=b61cd99cd4388489a830d20bc996be169eebd9cc;hp=c2614ef471cef514b14f3a7878a1523ea453c603;hb=b3da5056c59d51bd48bd8cfc6f573fce492e0974;hpb=9bb036f18457a6c2d24343e21e6950f9df5043e7

diff --git a/8sync/agenda.scm b/8sync/agenda.scm
index c2614ef..b61cd99 100644
--- a/8sync/agenda.scm
+++ b/8sync/agenda.scm
@@ -66,7 +66,8 @@
 
             run-it wrap wrap-apply run run-at run-delay
 
-            %port-request %run %run-at %run-delay
+            %run %run-at %run-delay %port-request 
+            %8sync-run %8sync-run-at %8sync-run-delay %8sync-port
             
             catch-8sync catch-%8sync
 
@@ -453,6 +454,13 @@ Will produce (0 . 0) instead of a negative number, if needed."
 
 (define port-request make-port-request)
 
+(define-record-type <port-remove-request>
+  (make-port-remove-request port)
+  port-remove-request?
+  (port port-remove-request-port))
+
+(define port-remove-request make-port-remove-request)
+
 
 
 ;;; Asynchronous escape to run things
@@ -546,12 +554,39 @@ return the wrong thing via (%8sync) and trip themselves up."
 (define-syntax-rule (%run-delay body ... delay-time)
   (%run-at body ... (tdelta delay-time)))
 
-(define-syntax-rule (%port-request add-this-port port-request-args ...)
+(define-syntax-rule (%port-request port port-request-args ...)
+  (make-async-request
+   (lambda (kont)
+     (list (make-port-request port port-request-args ...)
+           (make-run-request kont)))))
+
+(define-syntax-rule (%port-remove-request port)
   (make-async-request
    (lambda (kont)
-     (list (make-port-request port-request-args ...)
+     (list (make-port-remove-request port)
            (make-run-request kont)))))
 
+
+;; Sugar
+(define-syntax-rule (%8sync-run rest ...)
+  "Sugar for (%8sync (%run ...))"
+  (%8sync (%run rest ...)))
+
+(define-syntax-rule (%8sync-run-at rest ...)
+  "Sugar for (%8sync (%run-at ...))"
+  (%8sync (%run-at rest ...)))
+
+(define-syntax-rule (%8sync-run-delay rest ...)
+  "Sugar for (%8sync (%run-delay ...))"
+  (%8sync (%run-delay rest ...)))
+
+(define-syntax-rule (%8sync-port rest ...)
+  "Sugar for (%8sync (%port-request ...))"
+  (%8sync (%port-request rest ...)))
+
+
+;; TODO: Write (%run-immediately)
+
 ;; TODO
 (define-syntax-rule (%run-with-return return body ...)
   (make-async-request
@@ -669,6 +704,7 @@ return the wrong thing via (%8sync) and trip themselves up."
   "Update an agenda for a port-request"
   (define (handle-selector request-selector port-map-selector)
     (if (request-selector port-request)
+        ;; @@: Should we remove if #f?
         (hash-set! (port-map-selector agenda)
                    (port-request-port port-request)
                    (request-selector port-request))))
@@ -677,6 +713,14 @@ return the wrong thing via (%8sync) and trip themselves up."
   (handle-selector port-request-except agenda-except-port-map))
 
 
+(define (agenda-handle-port-remove-request! agenda port-remove-request)
+  "Update an agenda for a port-remove-request"
+  (let ((port (port-remove-request-port port-remove-request)))
+    (hash-remove! (agenda-read-port-map agenda) port)
+    (hash-remove! (agenda-write-port-map agenda) port)
+    (hash-remove! (agenda-except-port-map agenda) port)))
+
+
 (define* (start-agenda agenda
                        #:key stop-condition
                        (get-time gettimeofday)
@@ -781,11 +825,14 @@ based on the results"
                     (#f
                      (enq! next-queue (run-request-proc run-request))))))))
         (define (handle-individual result)
+          ;; @@: Could maybe optimize by switching to an explicit cond...
           (match result
             ((? run-request? new-proc)
              (enqueue new-proc))
             ((? port-request? port-request)
              (agenda-handle-port-request! agenda port-request))
+            ((? port-remove-request? port-remove-request)
+             (agenda-handle-port-remove-request! agenda port-remove-request))
             ;; do nothing
             (_ #f)))
         ;; @@: We might support delay-wrapped procedures here