X-Git-Url: https://jxself.org/git/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=loopy.scm;h=b93a1debbfab0bc6701c3b536394f3442c353c30;hb=e0499fb27f966a6c81679e9d83260164197e5ff7;hp=405ede178c363e3ec01753b24d428bca4e21bd18;hpb=3fa8854a5fd38680916a288ca6c3d852d6fcce26;p=8sync.git diff --git a/loopy.scm b/loopy.scm index 405ede1..b93a1de 100644 --- a/loopy.scm +++ b/loopy.scm @@ -3,26 +3,38 @@ #:use-module (srfi srfi-9 gnu) #:use-module (ice-9 q) #:use-module (ice-9 match) - #:export (make-agenda - agenda? + #:use-module (ice-9 receive) + #:export ( + make-agenda agenda? agenda-queue agenda-prompt-tag agenda-port-pmapping agenda-schedule make-async-prompt-tag - make-time-segment - time-segment? + + make-time-segment time-segment? time-segment-time time-segment-queue - time-< time-= + time-< time-= time-<= - make-schedule + + make-schedule schedule? schedule-add! schedule-empty? + schedule-segments + + schedule-segments-split schedule-extract-until! + add-segments-contents-to-queue! make-port-mapping port-mapping-set! port-mapping-remove! port-mapping-empty? port-mapping-non-empty? + + make-run-request run-request? + run-request-proc run-request-when + + run wrap run-wrap run-wrap-at + %current-agenda start-agenda agenda-run-once)) @@ -86,7 +98,7 @@ (define (time-segment-right-format time) (match time ;; time is already a cons of second and microsecnd - (((? integer? s) (? integer? u)) time) + (((? integer? s) . (? integer? u)) time) ;; time was just an integer (just the second) ((? integer? _) (cons time 0)) (_ (throw 'invalid-time "Invalid time" time)))) @@ -109,21 +121,104 @@ (and (= (car time1) (car time2)) (= (cdr time1) (cdr time2)))) -(define (make-schedule) - '()) +(define (time-<= time1 time2) + (or (time-< time1 time2) + (time-= time1 time2))) + +(define-record-type + (make-schedule-intern segments) + schedule? + (segments schedule-segments set-schedule-segments!)) +(define* (make-schedule #:optional segments) + (make-schedule-intern (or segments '()))) + +;; TODO: This code is reasonably easy to read but it +;; mutates AND is worst case of O(n) in both space and time :( +;; but at least it'll be reasonably easy to refactor to +;; a more functional setup? (define (schedule-add! time proc schedule) (let ((time (time-segment-right-format time))) - (define (belongs-before? segments) - (or (null? segments) - (error)) - ) - - ;; Find and add a schedule segment - (error))) + (define (new-time-segment) + (let ((new-segment + (make-time-segment time))) + (enq! (time-segment-queue new-segment) proc) + new-segment)) + (define (loop segments) + (define (segment-equals-time? segment) + (time-= time (time-segment-time segment))) + + (define (segment-more-than-time? segment) + (time-< time (time-segment-time segment))) + + ;; We could switch this out to be more mutate'y + ;; and avoid the O(n) of space... is that over-optimizing? + (match segments + ;; If we're at the end of the list, time to make a new + ;; segment... + ('() (cons (new-time-segment) '())) + ;; If the segment's time is exactly our time, good news + ;; everyone! Let's append our stuff to its queue + (((? segment-equals-time? first) rest ...) + (enq! (time-segment-queue first) proc) + segments) + ;; If the first segment is more than our time, + ;; ours belongs before this one, so add it and + ;; start consing our way back + (((? segment-more-than-time? first) rest ...) + (cons (new-time-segment) segments)) + ;; Otherwise, build up recursive result + ((first rest ... ) + (cons first (loop rest))))) + (set-schedule-segments! + schedule + (loop (schedule-segments schedule))))) (define (schedule-empty? schedule) - (eq? schedule '())) + (eq? (schedule-segments schedule) '())) + +(define (schedule-segments-split schedule time) + "Does a multiple value return of time segments before/at and after TIME" + (let ((time (time-segment-right-format time))) + (define (segment-is-now? segment) + (time-= (time-segment-time segment) time)) + (define (segment-is-before-now? segment) + (time-< (time-segment-time segment) time)) + + (let loop ((segments-before '()) + (segments-left (schedule-segments schedule))) + (match segments-left + ;; end of the line, return + ('() + (values (reverse segments-before) '())) + + ;; It's right now, so time to stop, but include this one in before + ;; but otherwise return + (((? segment-is-now? first) rest ...) + (values (reverse (cons first segments-before)) rest)) + + ;; This is prior or at now, so add it and keep going + (((? segment-is-before-now? first) rest ...) + (loop (cons first segments-before) rest)) + + ;; Otherwise it's past now, just return what we have + (segments-after + (values segments-before segments-after)))))) + +(define (schedule-extract-until! schedule time) + "Extract all segments until TIME from SCHEDULE, and pop old segments off" + (receive (segments-before segments-after) + (schedule-segments-split schedule time) + (set-schedule-segments! schedule segments-after) + segments-before)) + +(define (add-segments-contents-to-queue! segments queue) + (for-each + (lambda (segment) + (let ((seg-queue (time-segment-queue segment))) + (while (not (q-empty? seg-queue)) + (enq! queue (deq! seg-queue))))) + segments)) @@ -156,6 +251,29 @@ (not (port-mapping-empty? port-mapping))) + +;;; Request to run stuff +;;; ==================== + +(define-record-type + (make-run-request proc when) + run-request? + (proc run-request-proc) + (when run-request-when)) + +(define* (run proc #:optional when) + (make-run-request proc when)) + +(define-syntax-rule (wrap body ...) + (lambda () + body ...)) + +(define-syntax-rule (run-wrap body ...) + (run (wrap body ...))) + +(define-syntax-rule (run-wrap-at body ... when) + (run (wrap body ...) when)) + ;;; Execution of agenda, and current agenda ;;; ======================================= @@ -195,6 +313,8 @@ based on the results" (enq! next-queue new-proc)))) ;; @@: We might support delay-wrapped procedures here (match proc-result + ;; TODO: replace procedure with something that indicates + ;; intent to run. Use a (run foo) procedure ((? procedure? new-proc) (enqueue new-proc)) (((? procedure? new-procs) ...)