X-Git-Url: https://jxself.org/git/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=loopy.scm;h=0a2cc44820c165ad000406417528fbd1231b35ae;hb=d8527313ec9a47476020db8e82451746483492ee;hp=3db157d4cf3f05ca18e8a06135d96a9dd97c04a1;hpb=3d3254bb7e398a28b6eb2f7596836684b897aeb0;p=8sync.git diff --git a/loopy.scm b/loopy.scm index 3db157d..0a2cc44 100644 --- a/loopy.scm +++ b/loopy.scm @@ -4,33 +4,79 @@ (ice-9 match)) ;; @@: Using immutable agendas here, so wouldn't it make sense to -;; replace this +;; replace this queue stuff with using pfds based immutable queues? (define-immutable-record-type - (make-agenda queue) + (make-agenda-intern queue prompt-tag port-mapping) agenda? - (queue agenda-queue)) + (queue agenda-queue) + (prompt-tag agenda-prompt-tag) + (port-mapping agenda-port-mapping)) -(define %current-agenda - (make-parameter (make-agenda (make-q)))) +(define (make-async-prompt-tag) + (make-prompt-tag "prompt")) + +(define* (make-agenda #:key + (queue (make-q)) + (prompt (make-prompt-tag)) + (port-mapping (make-port-mapping))) + (make-agenda-intern queue prompt port-mapping)) + +(define (make-port-mapping) + (make-hash-table)) + +(define (port-mapping-set! port-mapping port #:optional read write except) + "Sets port-mapping for reader / writer / exception handlers" + (if (not (or read write except)) + (throw 'no-handlers-given "No handlers given for port" port)) + (hashq-set! port-mapping port + `#(,read ,write ,except))) + +(define (port-mapping-remove! port-mapping port) + (hashq-remove! port-mapping port)) + +;; TODO: This is O(n), I'm pretty sure :\ +;; ... it might be worthwhile for us to have a +;; port-mapping record that keeps a count of how many +;; handlers (maybe via a promise?) +(define (port-mapping-empty? port-mapping) + "Is this port mapping empty?" + (eq? (hash-count (const #t) port-mapping) 0)) + +(define (port-mapping-non-empty? port-mapping) + "Whether this port-mapping contains any elements" + (not (port-mapping-empty? port-mapping))) + +(define %current-agenda (make-parameter #f)) (define* (start-agenda agenda #:optional stop-condition) (let loop ((agenda agenda)) - (let ((new-agenda - (agenda-run-once agenda))) - (%current-agenda new-agenda) - (if (and stop-condition (stop-condition)) + (let ((new-agenda + ;; @@: Hm, maybe here would be a great place to handle + ;; select'ing on ports. + ;; We could compose over agenda-run-once and agenda-read-ports + (parameterize ((%current-agenda agenda)) + (agenda-run-once agenda)))) + (if (and stop-condition (stop-condition agenda)) 'done (loop new-agenda))))) (define (agenda-run-once agenda) "Run once through the agenda, and produce a new agenda based on the results" + (define (call-proc proc) + (call-with-prompt + (agenda-prompt-tag agenda) + (lambda () + (proc)) + ;; TODO + (lambda (k) k))) + (let ((queue (agenda-queue agenda)) (next-queue (make-q))) (while (not (q-empty? queue)) (let* ((proc (q-pop! queue)) - (proc-result (proc)) + (proc-result (call-proc proc)) (enqueue (lambda (new-proc) (enq! next-queue new-proc)))) @@ -38,11 +84,13 @@ based on the results" (match proc-result ((? procedure? new-proc) (enqueue new-proc)) - (((? procedure? new-procs) ..) + (((? procedure? new-procs) ...) (for-each (lambda (new-proc) (enqueue new-proc)) - new-procs))) - ;; TODO: Selecting on ports would happen here? - ;; Return new agenda, with next queue set - (set-field agenda (agenda-queue) next-queue))))) + new-procs)) + ;; do nothing + (_ #f)))) + ;; TODO: Selecting on ports would happen here? + ;; Return new agenda, with next queue set + (set-field agenda (agenda-queue) next-queue)))